Public Biological Databases and the Sui Generis Database Right

Author:

Bernier Alexander,Busse Christian,Bubela Tania

Abstract

AbstractThe sui generis database right is an intellectual property right created in the European Union to stimulate investment in the curation of databases. Since its inception, communities engaged in research and development efforts have questioned its potential to incentivise database production, and posit that it stifles productive downstream uses of existing datasets. European courts have restricted the right’s ambit through a restrictive interpretation of the circumstances in which it applies, which we argue, enables downstream use of biological databases. Nonetheless, residual ambiguities about potential infringement of the right exist. The prospect of unintentional infringement can frustrate downstream innovation. These ambiguities are compounded because the criteria that determine whether or not the right applies are reliant on information that is not available to the prospective downstream users of public datasets. Repealing the sui generis database right is recommended. Legislatures are advised to refrain from the implementation of broad novel intellectual property rights in the future, without first adopting safeguards that mitigate the potential for such rights to frustrate the reuse of available intangibles to the detriment of pro-social innovation.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference82 articles.

1. Afshinnekoo E, Ahsanuddin S, Mason CE (2016) Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research. Br Med Bull 120:27

2. Benkler Y (2007) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, London

3. Beunen AC (2007) Protection for databases: the European Database Directive and its effects in the Netherlands, France, and the United Kingdom. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen

4. Borghi M, Karapapa S (2015) Contractual restrictions on lawful use of information: sole-source databases through the backdoor? EIPR 37(8):505–514

5. Bottis M (2015) How open data become proprietary in the Court of Justice of the European Union. In: Katsikas SK, Sideridis AB (eds) E-cemocracy. CCIS, p 570

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3