Author:
Bernier Alexander,Busse Christian,Bubela Tania
Abstract
AbstractThe sui generis database right is an intellectual property right created in the European Union to stimulate investment in the curation of databases. Since its inception, communities engaged in research and development efforts have questioned its potential to incentivise database production, and posit that it stifles productive downstream uses of existing datasets. European courts have restricted the right’s ambit through a restrictive interpretation of the circumstances in which it applies, which we argue, enables downstream use of biological databases. Nonetheless, residual ambiguities about potential infringement of the right exist. The prospect of unintentional infringement can frustrate downstream innovation. These ambiguities are compounded because the criteria that determine whether or not the right applies are reliant on information that is not available to the prospective downstream users of public datasets. Repealing the sui generis database right is recommended. Legislatures are advised to refrain from the implementation of broad novel intellectual property rights in the future, without first adopting safeguards that mitigate the potential for such rights to frustrate the reuse of available intangibles to the detriment of pro-social innovation.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference82 articles.
1. Afshinnekoo E, Ahsanuddin S, Mason CE (2016) Globalizing and crowdsourcing biomedical research. Br Med Bull 120:27
2. Benkler Y (2007) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, London
3. Beunen AC (2007) Protection for databases: the European Database Directive and its effects in the Netherlands, France, and the United Kingdom. Wolf Legal Publishers, Nijmegen
4. Borghi M, Karapapa S (2015) Contractual restrictions on lawful use of information: sole-source databases through the backdoor? EIPR 37(8):505–514
5. Bottis M (2015) How open data become proprietary in the Court of Justice of the European Union. In: Katsikas SK, Sideridis AB (eds) E-cemocracy. CCIS, p 570