The Origin and Purpose of Legal Protection for the Integrity of Copyright Metadata

Author:

Cadavid Jhonny AntonioORCID

Abstract

AbstractRights management information is copyright metadata legally protected by copyright law. The origin of such protection was a United States policy for governance of the information superhighway (the internet) and digital networks. The main discussion documents leading up to the WIPO internet treaties reveal that the policy behind protecting the integrity of copyright metadata was aimed at higher objectives of public interest, such as consumer protection, market efficiencies, and authenticity of creative content. Copyright management information was envisaged as one element of digital infrastructures for creating global electronic commerce, but digital copyright was also foreseen as important for the dissemination of cultural heritage. Today these infrastructures have become a reality through legislation on orphan and out-of-commerce works in Europe, and for the licensing and distribution of royalties for musical works and sound recordings in the US. Countries that implement the WIPO treaties or transplant the US law without considering the whole policy behind the protection of copyright metadata are falling into a copyright management gap because, globally, the discovery, visibility, compensation, and monetisation of local content from places without adequate digital rights metadata infrastructures will be more challenging. This article shows that US digital dominance is codifying and writing the DNA of cultural content.

Funder

Victoria University of Wellington

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Law,Political Science and International Relations

Reference66 articles.

1. Attanasio P (2010) Rights information infrastructures and voluntary stakeholders agreements in digital library programmes. Ital J Libr Inf Sci 1:237–248

2. Bangemann Group (1994) Report on Europe and the global information society. Bulletin of the European Union Supplement 2/94, Luxembourg

3. Bennett CJ, Parsons C, Molnar A (2014) Forgetting, non-forgetting and quasi-forgetting in social networking: Canadian policy and corporate practice. In: Gutwirth S, Leenes R, De Hert P (eds) Reloading data protection multidisciplinary insights and contemporary challenges. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 41–59

4. Bobbio N (1990) Contribución a la Teoría del Derecho. Editorial Debate, Madrid

5. Boyle J (1996) Intellectual property policy online: a young person’s guide. Harvard J Law Technol 10(1):48–111

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Addressing Security Challenges in Copyright Management Applications: The Blockchain Perspective;Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies;2024

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3