Abstract
AbstractIt is commonly assumed that dry and saturated sands exhibit similar cone resistance–relative density relationships. Some studies pointed out that partial saturation and calcareous sands with considerable fines content are potential factors affecting these relationships. However, there is experimental evidence in Shaqour Bull Eng Geol Environ 66:59-70, (2006) that clean uncemented quartz sand may exhibit lower cone resistance in saturated conditions. The present study aims on contributing towards better understanding the effect of water saturation on cone resistance in sand. For this purpose, Ticino sand samples were prepared dry and saturated in a calibration chamber and cone penetration tests were performed over a wide range of relative densities and at two consolidation stresses. Overall, it was observed that dry and saturated samples exhibited similar cone resistances. Only slightly higher cone resistances were observed for dry samples at the lower consolidation stress. Two anomalous samples, which were tested dry at medium relative density, were found to exhibit way higher cone resistances than expected from published cone resistance–relative density relationships. The Young's modulus was observed to be proportional to cone resistance and independent of whether a sample was tested dry or saturated, being therefore considered as more robust soil property for cone resistance relationships.
Funder
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Geology,Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
Reference46 articles.
1. Almeida M, Jamiolkowski M, Peterson R (1991) Preliminary result of CPT tests in calcareous Quiou sand. In: Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Calibration Chamber Testing/ISOCCTI, Potsdam, Germany. Elsevier Science Publishing Co, New York, pp: 41-53
2. Arroyo M, Butlanska J, Gens A, Calvetti F, Jamiolkowski M (2011) Cone penetration tests in a virtual calibration chamber. Géotechnique 61:525–531. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.9.P.067
3. ASTM D5778 (2012) Standard test method for electronic friction cone and piezocone penetration testing of soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1520/D5778-12
4. ASTM D7181 (2020) Standard test method for consolidated drained triaxial compression test for soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1520/D7181-20
5. Baldi G, Bellotti R, Ghionna V, Jamiolkowski M, Pasqualini E (1981) Cone resistance of a dry medium sand. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Stockholm, Sweden. pp: 427-432
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献