Abstract
AbstractFuture configurations of the power system in the central region of the USA are dependent on relative costs of alternative power generation technologies, energy and environmental policies, and multiple climate-induced stresses. Higher demand in the summer months combined with compounding supply shocks in several power generation technologies can potentially cause a “perfect storm” leading to failure of the power system. Potential future climate stress must be incorporated in investment decisions and energy system planning and operation. We assess how projected future climate impacts on the power system would affect alternative pathways for the electricity sector considering a broad range of generation technologies and changes in demand. We calculate a “potential supply gap” metric for each pathway, system component, and sub-region of the US Heartland due to climate-induced effects on electricity demand and power generation. Potential supply gaps range from 5% in the North Central region under mild changes in climate to 21% in the Lakes-Mid Atlantic region under more severe climate change. We find increases in electricity demand to be more important in determining the size of the potential supply gap than stresses on power generation, while larger shares of renewables in the power system contribute to lower supply gaps. Our results provide a first step toward considering systemic climate impacts that may require changes in managing the grid or on potential additional capacity/reserves that may be needed.
Funder
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference87 articles.
1. Allen M, Fernandez S, Fu J et al (2016) Impacts of climate change on sub-regional electricity demand and distribution in the southern United States. Nat Energy 1:16103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.103
2. Allen-Dumas MR, KC B, Cunliff CI (2019) Extreme weather and climate vulnerabilities of the electric grid: a summary of environmental sensitivity quantification methods. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, TN, ORNL/TM-2019,1252. https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2019/09/f67/Oak%20Ridge%20National%20Laboratory%20EIS%20Response.pdf
3. Attia SI (2015) The influence of condenser cooling water temperature on the thermal efficiency of a nuclear power plant. Ann Nucl Energy 80:371–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ANUCENE.2015.02.023
4. Auffhammer M, Baylis P, Hausman CH (2017) Climate change is projected to have severe impacts on the frequency and intensity of peak electricity demand across the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:1886–1891
5. Baker J, Strzepek K, Farmer W, Schlosser CA (2014) Quantifying the impact of renewable energy futures on cooling water use. J Am Water Resour Assoc, 50(5): 1289–1303. (https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12188)