Abstract
AbstractEffective climate change adaptation requires cohesive inter-institutional networks across different scales, facilitating the sharing of data, information, knowledge, and practices. However, the impact of adaptation attributes across scales is poorly understood due to limited focus on these networks. Based on interviews with 26 institutions operating at the national level (ION) in India and 26 institutions operating within a state (Himachal Pradesh) (IOS), this study analysed adaptation attributes and the inter-institutional networks across the two scales to understand its implications at different scales. IONs have a greater capacity (compared to IOS) to frame guidelines, standards and regulations for practitioners along with better accessibility to resources and information. When coupled with bridging institutions, this can enhance adaptive capacities at other scales. Conversely, learnings from low regret adaptive measures being implemented by IOS are opportunities for informing national policy strategies. While national adaptation strategies and goals can inspire adaptation at lower scales, the currently fragmented inter-institutional network in India reduces the passage and accessibility of data and information, creating a bottleneck for the smooth devolution of adaptation attributes. Recruitment and deployment practices for water officials further entrench silo attitudes, impeding essential data accessibility. Adaptation needs comprehensive networks across vertical, horizontal, and diagonal institutional connections to improve climate risk perception and strategy implementation. Policy measures should consider socio-institutional factors beyond legislative prescriptions.
Funder
Natural Environment Research Council
Government of India
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference84 articles.
1. A Dazé, H Price-Kelly, N Rass (2016) Vertical Integration in National Adaptation Plan (NAP) Processes: A guidance note for linking national and sub-national adaptation processes. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Winnipeg, Canada. Available online at: www.napglobalnetwork.org
2. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15:77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.12.005
3. Aguiar APD, Collste D, Harmáčková ZV, Pereira L, Selomane O, Galafassi D, Van Vuuren D, Van Der Leeuw S (2020) Co-designing global target-seeking scenarios: A cross-scale participatory process for capturing multiple perspectives on pathways to sustainability. Global Environ Change 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102198
4. Ahuja G, Soda G, Zaheer A (2012) The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks. Organ Sci 23:434–448. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1110.0695
5. Al-Zu’bi M (2016) Jordan’s climate change governance framework: from silos to an intersectoral approach. Environ Syst Decis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-016-9602-9
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献