Abstract
Abstract
Subjective well-being can be measured in different ways, depending on the conceptual perspective one adopts. Hedonic well-being, emphasising emotions and evaluation, is often contrasted with eudemonic well-being, stressing self-actualisation and autonomy. In this paper we investigate the background, structure and compatibility of empirical measures of hedonic and eudemonic well-being in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We use a confirmatory factor approach to investigate the internal of structure of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Centre for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CES-D), Satisfaction with Life scale (SWLS) and CASP, a measure of quality of life in old age. In a second step, we examine the higher order structure of well-being using these measures. Next to highlighting specific issues about the structure of these measures in connection to older populations, we illustrate that a threefold structure, distinguishing affective, cognitive and eudemonic aspects of well-being, is more informative than the two dimensional hedonic and eudemonic well-being that is often propagated.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography
Reference72 articles.
1. Alexopoulos, G. S. (2005). Depression in the elderly. Lancet, 365(9475), 1961–1970.
2. Ariely, G., & Davidov, E. (2011). Assessment of measurement equivalence with cross-national and longitudinal surveys in political science. European Political Science, 1, 1–15.
3. Beaumont, J. (2011). Measuring National Well-being - Discussion paper on domains and measures. London.
4. Beekman, A. T., & Deeg, D. (1995). Major and minor depression in later life: a study of prevalence and risk factors. Journal of Affective Di, 36, 65–75. doi:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00243.x.
5. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables (p. 514). Wiley.
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献