Abstract
Abstract
Background
The aging population is increasingly faced with daily life limitations, threatening their Functional Independence (FI). These limitations extend different life domains and require a broad range of community-care professionals to be addressed. The Decision Support Tool for Functional Independence (DST-FI) facilitates community-care professionals in providing uncontradictory recommendations regarding the maintenance of FI in community-dwelling older people. The current study aims to determine the validity and reliability of the DST-FI.
Methods
Sixty community-care professionals completed a twofold assessment. To assess construct validity, participants were asked to assign predefined recommendations to fifty cases of older people to maintain their level of FI. Hypotheses were tested regarding the expected recommendations per case. Content validity was assessed by questions on relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the current set of recommendations. Twelve participants repeated the assessment after two weeks to enable both within- and between rater reliability properties, expressed by an Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.
Results
Seven out of eight predefined hypotheses confirmed expectations, indicating high construct validity. As the recommendations were indicated ‘relevant’ and ‘complete’, content validity was high as well. Agreement between raters was poor to moderate while agreement within raters was moderate to excellent, resulting in moderate overall reliability.
CONCLUSION
The DST-FI suggests high validity and moderate reliability properties when used in a population of community-dwelling older people. The tool could facilitate community-care professionals in their task to preserve FI in older people. Future research should focus on psychometric properties like feasibility, acceptability, and developing and piloting strategies for implementation in community-care.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development,Demography
Reference49 articles.
1. Beasley, T. M., & Schumacher, R. E. (1995). Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: Post hoc and planned comparison procedures. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1995.9943797
2. Bujang, M. A. (2017). A simplified guide to determination of sample size requirements for estimating the value of intraclass correlation coefficient: A review. Archives of Orofacial Sciences, 12, 1–11.
3. Butera, K. A., George, S. Z., & Lentz, T. A. (2019). Psychometric evaluation of the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool: Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity. Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2019.09.003
4. Corvol, A., Dreier, A., Prudhomm, J., et al. (2017). Consequences of clinical case management for caregivers: A systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32, 473–483.
5. Cruz-Jentoft, A. J., Baeyens, J. P., Bauer, J. M., et al. (2010). Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: Report of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People. Age and Ageing, 39, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq034
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献