Growth of European beech recovered faster than that of Norway spruce after a five-year experimental drought in a mixed forest stand

Abstract

Abstract Key Message Beech growth acclimated better during severe drought and recovered faster than spruce after drought ended. This was associated with a shift in performance along relative tree size towards small trees. Abstract The effects of several consecutive drought years and the recovery reaction of mature trees in particular after a long-term drought have been poorly studied so far. In this study, we demonstrate the growth reactions of mature trees during and after a five-year treatment of extended summer droughts, followed by controlled irrigation in a very productive mixed forest stand. We exposed 70-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst) and 90-year-old European beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) trees to reduced precipitation using automatic throughfall exclusion (TE) roofs during the growing seasons from 2014 to 2018, irrigated the trees in early summer 2019 and removed the roofs thereafter. From 2009 to 2022, we monitored annual tree growth and precipitation on 6 plots with throughfall exclusion and on 6 plots with ambient Control conditions (CO) of the KROOF canopy experiment. Norway spruce lost significant growth during drought, with some trees dying and others remaining at a low growth level without significant recovery from the effects of drought stress. European beech also significantly reduced growth at the beginning of the drought but emerged stronger in growth from the drought than the Control group. Spruce and beech showed a non-significant trend of increased inter-specific growth compared to intra-specific growth during drought. We found that spruce benefitted more from mixture than beech in the recovery phase after drought than during the drought phase itself. Most importantly, we observed a shift in growth performance along the relative tree size towards smaller trees in the TE plots for both species. This change in the relationship between diameter increment and tree size during and after drought is a major finding of our study and suggests a possible response mechanism to prolonged drought. This key observation requires further investigation and should be considered in future forest management strategies under changing climatic conditions.