Abstract
Abstract
Key message
The high-quality sap flow dataset of Melaleuca styphelioides could assists local councils in assessing tree water use and aids in the development of an urban tree sustainable planting management plan
Trees have a vital part to play in urban ecosystems, offering ecological, economic, and social advantages in addition to beautifying our suburbs. Knowledge of tree water use in urban environments is crucial for facilitating urban greening when there is a perception that growing trees on the street verge on expansive soils poses a risk to pavement and buildings. Information on long-term water use by individual trees in an urban environment is essential for local councils in developing urban tree management plans for sustainable planning of trees; however, this information is scarce. Micrometeorological models have commonly been used to estimate the canopy transpiration of plants in the absence of sap flow data. However, the reliability and accuracy of these models have rarely been assessed using sap flow measurements at the field site. This study aimed to provide the water use data of four individual Australian native Melaleuca styphelioides Sm. using sap flow instruments over 25 months. Tree transpiration, estimated based on three commonly used micrometeorological models using weather parameters and tree characteristics, was assessed and compared with sap flow measurements by employing the linear regression statistical analysis. The results revealed that the modified Penman–Monteith (PM) model demonstrated the highest level of accuracy among the evaluated models, consistently yielding lower errors and providing more reliable estimates of tree water use. This suggests that this model may be more appropriate for predicting plant water use in situations where sap flow data are unavailable.
Funder
Australian Research Council
Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Allen RG, Jensen ME, Wright JL, Burman RD (1989) Operational estimates of reference evapotranspiration. J Agron 81:650–662
2. Allen RG, Walter IA, Elliott RL, Howell TA, Itenfisu D, Jensen ME, Snyder RL (eds) (2005) The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia, USA
3. Amazirh A, Er-Raki S, Chehbouni A, Rivalland V (2017) Modified Penman-Monteith equation for monitoring evapotranspiration of wheat crop: Relationship between the surface resistance and remotely sensed stress index. Biosyst Eng 164:68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2017.09.015
4. Blonquist JM Jr, Allen RG, Bugbee B (2010) An evaluation of the net radiation sub-model in the ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation: implications for evapotranspiration prediction. Agric Water Manag 97:1026–1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.02.008
5. BOM (Bureau of Meteorology) (2021) Climate Data Online. Website: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data/. Accessed 19 Oct 2021