Comparing structural models of linear elastic responses to bending in inosculated joints

Abstract

Abstract Key message Mechanical models of inosculations benefit from moderate geometric detail and characterisation of the structurally optimised area of interwoven tension-resistant fibres between the branches. Abstract Living architecture is formed by shaping and merging trees, often in combination with non-living technical elements. These structures often employ the mechanical and physiological adaptations of living trees to support structural loads. Designed and vernacular buildings utilise inosculations to redistribute forces, redirect growth, and provide redundancy. Mechanical models of inosculations in living architecture must be built according to the adaptations available to the tree. Here, mass allocation and fibre orientation are examined. Under typical gravity loads, a zone at the top of the inosculation is subject to tension. This is of particular interest because a trade-off in fibre orientation between mechanical and physiological optimisation is necessary. In tree forks, this results in specifically adapted interwoven fibres. In this study, Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is used to develop different mechanical models to fit bending experiments of four Salix alba inosculations, comparing the models’ accuracy in replicating rotations in the joint. Nine models were developed. Three levels of detail of mass allocation are considered for global isotropic (3 models) and orthotropic (3 models) mechanical properties as well as a model including the interwoven tension zone, a model of local branch and trunk orthotropy, and a model combining these two localised features. Results show significant accuracy gains come from moderate geometric accuracy and consideration of the tension-zone optimisation. The construction of the tension zone in FEA is simple and applicable to natural and artificially induced inosculations.