Abstract
AbstractThe personalization of curriculum plays a pivotal role in supporting students in achieving their unique learning goals. In recent years, researchers have dedicated efforts to address the challenge of personalizing curriculum through diverse techniques and approaches. However, it is crucial to acknowledge the phenomenon of student forgetting, as individuals exhibit variations in limitations, backgrounds, and goals, as evidenced by studies in the field of learning sciences. This paper introduces the complex issue of fully individualizing a curriculum while considering the impact of student forgetting, presenting a comprehensive framework to tackle this problem. Moreover, we conduct two experiments to explore this issue, aiming to assess the difficulty of identifying relevant curricula within this context and uncover behavioral patterns associated with the problem. The findings from these experiments provide valuable prescriptive recommendations for educational stakeholders seeking to implement personalized approaches. Furthermore, we demonstrate the complexity of this problem, highlighting the need for our framework as an initial decision-making tool to address this challenging endeavor.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,Education
Reference74 articles.
1. Acampora, G., Gaeta, M., & Loia, V. (2011). Hierarchical optimization of personalized experiences for e-learning systems through evolutionary models. Neural Computing and Applications,20(5), 641–657
2. Aleven, V., McLaughlin, E. A., Glenn, R. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2016). Instruction based on adaptive learning technologies. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, 2, 522–560.
3. Al-Muhaideb, S., & Menai, M. E. B. (2011). Evolutionary computation approaches to the curriculum sequencing problem. Natural Computing,10(2), 891–920
4. Anderson, J.R., & Schunn, C.D. (2013). Implications of the act-r learning theory: No magic bullets. In: Advances in Instructional Psychology, pp. 1–33. Routledge
5. Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Stanush, P. L., & McNelly, T. L. (1998). Factors that influence skill decay and retention: A quantitative review and analysis. Human Performance,11(1), 57–101