Learning Analytics to Reveal Links Between Learning Design and Self-Regulated Learning
-
Published:2021-05-21
Issue:4
Volume:31
Page:980-1021
-
ISSN:1560-4292
-
Container-title:International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Int J Artif Intell Educ
Author:
Fan Yizhou,Matcha Wannisa,Uzir Nora’ayu Ahmad,Wang Qiong,Gašević Dragan
Abstract
AbstractThe importance of learning design in education is widely acknowledged in the literature. Should learners make effective use of opportunities provided in a learning design, especially in online environments, previous studies have shown that they need to have strong skills for self-regulated learning (SRL). The literature, which reports the use of learning analytics (LA), shows that SRL skills are best exhibited in choices of learning tactics that are reflective of metacognitive control and monitoring. However, in spite of high significance for evaluation of learning experience, the link between learning design and learning tactics has been under-explored. In order to fill this gap, this paper proposes a novel learning analytic method that combines three data analytic techniques, including a cluster analysis, a process mining technique, and an epistemic network analysis. The proposed method was applied to a dataset collected in a massive open online course (MOOC) on teaching in flipped classrooms which was offered on a Chinese MOOC platform to pre- and in-service teachers. The results showed that the application of the approach detected four learning tactics (Search oriented, Content and assessment oriented, Content oriented and Assessment oriented) which were used by MOOC learners. The analysis of tactics’ usage across learning sessions revealed that learners from different performance groups had different priorities. The study also showed that learning tactics shaped by instructional cues were embedded in different units of study in MOOC. The learners from a high-performance group showed a high level of regulation through strong alignment of the choices of learning tactics with tasks provided in the learning design. The paper also provides a discussion about implications of research and practice.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Peking University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Computational Theory and Mathematics,Education
Reference109 articles.
1. van der Aalst, W., Weijters, T., Maruster, L. (2004). Workflow mining: discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(9), 1128–1142, Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2004.47. 2. Ahmad Uzir, N., Gašević, D., Matcha, W., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A., Lim, L.A., Gentili, S. (2019). Discovering time management strategies in learning processes using process mining techniques. In Scheffel, M., Broisin, J., Pammer-Schindler, V., Ioannou, A., & Schneider, J. (Eds.) Transforming Learning with Meaningful Technologies, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 555–569). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29736-7_41. 3. Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J., Leskovec, J. (2014). Engaging with massive online courses. In Proceedings of the 23rd International conference on World Wide Web, WWW ’14, Event-place: Seoul, Korea (pp. 687–698). New York: ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2566486.2568042. 4. Arruarte, A., Fernández-Castro, I., Ferrero, B., Greer, J.E. (1997). The IRIS Shell: “How to Build ITSs from Pedagogical and Design Requisites” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (IJAIED), 8, 341–381. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197387. 5. Arruarte, A., Fernández-Castro, I., Greer, J. (1996). The CLAI Model: a cognitive theory of instruction to guide its development. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education; Charlottesville, 7(3), 277–313. https://search.proquest.com/docview/1468384818/citation/6CBD6BF2B8354DA4PQ/1. Num Pages: 37 Place: Charlottesville, United States, Charlottesville Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Cited by
50 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|