Dark archives or a dark age for reasoning over archives?

Author:

Bell Mark,Bunn JennyORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis article considers that reasoning over archives is a joint enterprise between archivists and researchers and that both groups are increasingly using machine agents to assist them in it. It starts by considering the processing of archivists, researchers and machine agents separately. Using the different perspectives this brings to highlight different aspects of that processing, as a process of sense-making, as scholarly research activity, as practices that realise and achieve data for the drawing of further inference, it reasserts the argument that archives cannot be regarded as raw data to be reasoned over, but must be seen as the result of multiple representative and interpretive acts, of iterative realisation and activation as ‘data’ potentially involving many, many additional actors. It then goes on to consider how the involvement of machine agents fits into and potentially alters this picture by providing more detail about the basis on which they currently perform such acts.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference36 articles.

1. Barry R, Gibbs Thibodeau S, Kiesling K, Pitti D, Ransom H, Spindler R (2013) Development of the encoded archival description DTD. https://www.loc.gov/ead/eaddev.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2021

2. Bearman D (1989) Archival methods. https://www.archimuse.com/publishing/archival_methods/. Accessed 30 Mar 2021

3. Benardou A, Constantopoulos P, Dallas C, Gavrilis D (2010) A conceptual model for scholarly research activity. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14945. Accessed 30 Mar 2021

4. Bianchi F, Rossiello G, Costabello L, Palmonari M, Minervini P (2020) Knowledge graph embeddings and explainable AI. In: Knowledge graphs for explainable artificial intelligence: foundations, applications and challenges. IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp 49–72

5. Borek L, Dombrowski Q, Perkins J, Schöch C (2016) TaDiRAH: a Case Study in Pragmatic Classification. Digit Humanit Q 10.1. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/1/000235/000235.html

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3