Socially robotic: making useless machines

Author:

Yolgormez Ceyda,Thibodeau Joseph

Abstract

AbstractAs robots increasingly become part of our everyday lives, questions arise with regards to how to approach them and how to understand them in social contexts. The Western history of human–robot relations revolves around competition and control, which restricts our ability to relate to machines in other ways. In this study, we take a relational approach to explore different manners of socializing with robots, especially those that exceed an instrumental approach. The nonhuman subjects of this study are built to explore non-purposeful behavior, in an attempt to break away from the assumptions of utility that underlie the hegemonic human–machine interactions. This breakaway is accompanied by ‘learning to be attuned’ on the side of the human subjects, which is facilitated by continuous relations at the level of everyday life. Our paper highlights this ground for the emergence of meanings and questions that could not be subsumed by frameworks of control and domination. The research-creation project Machine Ménagerie serves as a case study for these ideas, demonstrating a relational approach in which the designer and the machines co-constitute each other through sustained interactions, becoming attuned to one another through the performance of research. Machine Ménagerie attempts to produce affective and playful—if not unruly—nonhuman entities that invite interaction yet have no intention of serving human social or physical needs. We diverge from other social robotics research by creating machines that do not attempt to mimic human social behaviours.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference53 articles.

1. Alač M, Movellan J, Tanaka F (2011) When a robot is social: spatial arrangements and multimodal semiotic engagement in the practice of social robotics. Soc Stud Sci 41(6):893–926. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711420565

2. Apps MAJ, Tsakiris M (2014) The free-energy self: a predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 41:85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.029

3. Bakhtin M (1981) The dialogic imagination: four essays. University of Texas Press

4. Bannon LJ (1995) From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. Readings in human-computer interaction. Elsevier, pp 205–214

5. Bertelsen OW (2006) Tertiary artefactness at the interface. In: Fishwick PA (ed) Aesthetic computing. The MIT Press

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3