Abstract
AbstractThe risks AI presents to society are broadly understood to be manageable through ‘general calculus’, i.e., general frameworks designed to enable those involved in the development of AI to apprehend and manage risk, such as AI impact assessments, ethical frameworks, emerging international standards, and regulations. This paper elaborates how risk is apprehended and managed by a regulator, developer and cyber-security expert. It reveals that risk and risk management is dependent on mundane situated practices not encapsulated in general calculus. Situated practice surfaces ‘iterable epistopics’, revealing how those involved in the development of AI know and subsequently respond to risk and uncover major challenges in their work. The ongoing discovery and elaboration of epistopics of risk in AI (a) furnishes a potential program of interdisciplinary inquiry, (b) provides AI developers with a means of apprehending risk, and (c) informs the ongoing evolution of general calculus.
Funder
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference52 articles.
1. Abdul A, Vermeulen J, Wang D, Lim B, Kankanhalli M (2018) Trends and trajectories for explainable, accountable and intelligible systems. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174156
2. Ada Lovelace Institute (2020) Examining the black box: tools for assessing algorithmic systems. https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/examining-the-black-box-tools-for-assessing-algorithmic-systems. Accessed 28 March 2024
3. AIA (2024) Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts https://artificialintelligenceact.eu/the-act. Accessed 28 March 2024
4. Annexes to the AIA (2021) https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:e0649735-a372-11eb-9585-01aa75ed71a1.0001.02/DOC_2&format=PDF. Accessed 28 March 2024
5. AI Ethicist (2024) AI frameworks, guidelines, toolkits. https://www.aiethicist.org/frameworks-guidelines-toolkits. Accessed 28 March 2024