Organization philosophy: a study of organizational goodness in the age of human and artificial intelligence collaboration

Author:

Horaguchi Haruo H.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis study challenges the conventional boundaries of philosophy by asserting that organizations can function as legitimate subjects within philosophical discourse. Western philosophy, epitomized by Descartes, has long assumed that individual human beings are the fundamental units of thought and moral agency. However, in a significant oversight, this belief overlooks the idea that organizations can think independently, leading to both virtuous and malevolent results. Epistemology lacks a clear prioritization of morally sound knowledge over potentially harmful knowledge. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has also transformed the landscape of cognition from a primarily individual human endeavor into a joint undertaking where humans collaborate with AI entities in collective thinking and decision-making. Nevertheless, AI lacks the innate ability to discern between ethical and unethical actions. This symbiosis creates organizations as fundamental philosophical subjects, marking a significant shift in philosophical emphasis where the organization takes the center stage. Accordingly, within this emerging field, we advance four propositions as the core subjects of organization philosophy: organizations can think, organizations can create knowledge, AI can be part of an organization, and humans in the organization control moral discipline. These propositions guide the ethical coexistence of AI and human agents in organizations, emphasizing the importance of ethical deliberation in knowledge use. Moreover, the malicious use of profound knowledge hinders human progress, as illustrated in this study by an ethical examination of military institutions within organization philosophy.

Funder

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference70 articles.

1. Barnard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

2. Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P (2020) The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

3. Descartes R (1637/2006) A discourse on method I. Maclean (Trans.). Oxford University Press, New York

4. Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad Manag Rev 38:181–205. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0215

5. Doidge N (2007) The brain that changes itself: stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Penguin Books, New York

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3