Abstract
AbstractThis study challenges the conventional boundaries of philosophy by asserting that organizations can function as legitimate subjects within philosophical discourse. Western philosophy, epitomized by Descartes, has long assumed that individual human beings are the fundamental units of thought and moral agency. However, in a significant oversight, this belief overlooks the idea that organizations can think independently, leading to both virtuous and malevolent results. Epistemology lacks a clear prioritization of morally sound knowledge over potentially harmful knowledge. The advent of artificial intelligence (AI) has also transformed the landscape of cognition from a primarily individual human endeavor into a joint undertaking where humans collaborate with AI entities in collective thinking and decision-making. Nevertheless, AI lacks the innate ability to discern between ethical and unethical actions. This symbiosis creates organizations as fundamental philosophical subjects, marking a significant shift in philosophical emphasis where the organization takes the center stage. Accordingly, within this emerging field, we advance four propositions as the core subjects of organization philosophy: organizations can think, organizations can create knowledge, AI can be part of an organization, and humans in the organization control moral discipline. These propositions guide the ethical coexistence of AI and human agents in organizations, emphasizing the importance of ethical deliberation in knowledge use. Moreover, the malicious use of profound knowledge hinders human progress, as illustrated in this study by an ethical examination of military institutions within organization philosophy.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference70 articles.
1. Barnard CI (1938) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
2. Baylis J, Smith S, Owens P (2020) The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 8th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
3. Descartes R (1637/2006) A discourse on method I. Maclean (Trans.). Oxford University Press, New York
4. Dionysiou DD, Tsoukas H (2013) Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within: a symbolic interactionist perspective. Acad Manag Rev 38:181–205. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0215
5. Doidge N (2007) The brain that changes itself: stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Penguin Books, New York