A free mind cannot be digitally transferred

Author:

Génova GonzaloORCID,Moreno ValentínORCID,Parra EugenioORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe digital transfer of the mind to a computer system (i.e., mind uploading) requires representing the mind as a finite sequence of bits (1s and 0s). The classic “stored-program computer” paradigm, in turn, implies the equivalence between program and data, so that the sequence of bits themselves can be interpreted as a program, which will be algorithmically executed in the receiving device. Now, according to a previous proof, on which this paper is based, a computational or algorithmic machine, however complex, cannot be free (in the sense of ‘self-determined’). Consequently, a finite sequence of bits cannot adequately represent a free mind and, therefore, a free mind cannot be digitally transferred, quod erat demonstrandum. The impossibility of making this transfer, as demonstrated here, should be a concern especially for those who wish to achieve it. Since we intend this to be a rigorous demonstration, we must give precise definitions and conditions of validity. The most important part of the paper is devoted to explaining the meaning and reasonableness of these definitions and conditions (for example that being truly free means being self-determined). Special attention is paid, also, to the philosophical implications of the demonstration. Finally, this thesis is distinguished from other closely related issues (such as other possible technological difficulties to “discretize” the mind; or, whether it is possible to transfer the mind from one material support to another one in a non-digital way).

Funder

Programa Estatal de I + D + i Orientada a los Retos de la Sociedad 2018

Convocatoria de Proyectos de I + D + i «Retos-Colaboración» 2019

Madrid Government (Comunidad de Madrid-Spain), Multiannual Agreement with UC3M in the line of Excellence of University Professors

Universidad Carlos III

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference25 articles.

1. Barrett N, Güell F, Murillo JI (2015) Los límites de la comprensión computacional del cerebro. Cuenta y Razón 34: 71–76 http://cuentayrazon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/revista34.pdf

2. Bostrom N, Roache R (2008) Ethical issues in human enhancement. In: Ryberg J, Petersen T, Wolf C (eds) New waves in applied ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 120–152

3. Churchland PS, Sejnowski TJ (1992) The computational brain. The MIT Press, Cambridge

4. Copeland BJ (2020) The Modern History of Computing. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.) https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2020/entries/computing-history/

5. Dreyfus HL (1992) What computers still can’t do: the limits of artificial intelligence. Harper and Row, New York

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Semiótica, computación, mecanicismo y libertad;HUMAN REVIEW. International Humanities Review / Revista Internacional de Humanidades;2022-03-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3