Machine invention systems: a (r)evolution of the invention process?

Author:

Vasilescu Dragos-Cristian,Filzmoser Michael

Abstract

AbstractCurrent developments in fields such as quantum physics, fine arts, robotics, cognitive sciences or defense and security indicate the emergence of creative systems capable of producing new and innovative solutions through combinations of machine learning algorithms. These systems, called machine invention systems, challenge the established invention paradigm in promising the automation of – at least parts of – the innovation process. This paper’s main contribution is twofold. Based on the identified state-of-the-art examples in the above mentioned fields, key components for machine invention systems and their relations are identified, creating a conceptual model as well as proposing a working definition for machine invention systems. The differences and delimitations to other concepts in the field of machine learning and artificial intelligence, such as machine discovery systems are discussed as well. Furthermore, the paper briefly addresses the social and societal implications and limitations that come with the adoption of the technology. Because of their revolutionizing potential, there are widespread implications to consider from ethical and moral implications to policymaking and societal changes, like changes in the job structure. The discussion part approaches some of these implications, as well as solutions to some of the proposed challenges. The paper concludes by discussing some of the systemic benefits that can be accessed through machine invention.

Funder

TU Wien

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference62 articles.

1. Altshuler EE, Linden DS (1997) Wire-antenna designs using genetic algorithms. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 39:33–43. https://doi.org/10.1109/74.584498

2. Arrow KJ (1971) The economic implications of learning by doing. Readings in the Theory of Growth. Springer, London, pp 131–149

3. Ayodele TO (2010) Types of machine learning algorithms. In: New advances in machine learning. InTech, pp 19–48

4. B.-N. Sanders E, (2002) From user-centered to participatory design approaches. In: Frascara J (ed) Design and the Social Sciences. CRC Press, Florida, pp 1–8

5. Balabanian N (2006) On the presumed neutrality of technology. IEEE Technol Soc Mag 25:15–25

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3