Abstract
AbstractDecisions where there is not enough information for a well-informed decision due to unidentified consequences, options, or undetermined demarcation of the decision problem are called decisions under great uncertainty. This paper argues that public policy decisions on how and if to implement decision-making processes based on machine learning and AI for public use are such decisions. Decisions on public policy on AI are uncertain due to three features specific to the current landscape of AI, namely (i) the vagueness of the definition of AI, (ii) uncertain outcomes of AI implementations and (iii) pacing problems. Given that many potential applications of AI in the public sector concern functions central to the public sphere, decisions on the implementation of such applications are particularly sensitive. Therefore, it is suggested that public policy-makers and decision-makers in the public sector can adopt strategies from the argumentative approach in decision theory to mitigate the established great uncertainty. In particular, the notions of framing and temporal strategies are considered.
Funder
Royal Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy
Reference69 articles.
1. Andrews L (2019) Public administration, public leadership and the construction of public value in the age of the algorithm and ‘big data.’ Publ Admin 97(2):296–310
2. Arrieta AB, Díaz-Rodríguez N, Del Ser J, Bennetot A, Tabik S, Barbado A, Herrera F (2020) Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI. Inf Fus 58:82–115
3. Béland D (2009) Ideas, institutions, and policy change. J Eur Publ Policy 16(5):701–718
4. Biran O, Cotton C (2017) Explanation and justification in machine learning: a survey. In IJCAI-17 workshop on explainable AI (XAI), vol. 8(1), pp. 8–13
5. Blyth M (2001) The transformation of the Swedish model: economic ideas, distributional conflict, and institutional change. World Politics 54(1):1–26
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献