Minding morality: ethical artificial societies for public policy modeling

Author:

Diallo Saikou Y.ORCID,Shults F. LeRonORCID,Wildman Wesley J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractPublic policies are designed to have an impact on particular societies, yet policy-oriented computer models and simulations often focus more on articulating the policies to be applied than on realistically rendering the cultural dynamics of the target society. This approach can lead to policy assessments that ignore crucial social contextual factors. For example, by leaving out distinctive moral and normative dimensions of cultural contexts in artificial societies, estimations of downstream policy effectiveness fail to account for dynamics that are fundamental in human life and central to many public policy challenges. In this paper, we supply evidence that incorporating morally salient dimensions of a culture is critically important for producing relevant and accurate evaluations of social policy when using multi-agent artificial intelligence models and simulations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference47 articles.

1. Ahrweiler P, Gilbert N, Pyka A (2016) Joining complexity science and social simulation for innovation policy: agent-based modelling using the skin platform. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

2. Andrighetto G, Conte R (2012) Cognitive dynamics of norm compliance. From norm adoption to flexible automated conformity. Artif Intell Law 20(4):359–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9135-6

3. Binmore KG (1994) Game theory and the social contract, vol. 1: playing fair. The MIT Press, Cambridge

4. Caldas JC, Coelho H (1999) The origin of institutions: socio-economic processes, choice, norms and conventions. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 2(2):1

5. Cliquet RL, Avramov D (2018) Evolution science and ethics in the third millennium: challenges and choices for humankind. Springer, Cham

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Can digital tools foster ethical deliberation?;Humanities and Social Sciences Communications;2024-01-17

2. The Role of Values in Pandemic Management: An Agent-Based Model;Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation;2024

3. Whether AI adoption challenges matter for public managers? The case of Polish cities;Government Information Quarterly;2023-06

4. Simulation, Science, and Stakeholders: Challenges and Opportunities for Modelling Solutions to Societal Problems;Complexity;2023-03-31

5. Applicability of Artificial Societies to Evaluate Health Care Policies;Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare;2023-02-21

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3