AI ethics with Chinese characteristics? Concerns and preferred solutions in Chinese academia

Author:

Zhu JunhuaORCID

Abstract

AbstractSince Chinese scholars are playing an increasingly important role in shaping the national landscape of discussion on AI ethics, understanding their ethical concerns and preferred solutions is essential for global cooperation on governance of AI. This article, therefore, provides the first elaborated analysis on the discourse on AI ethics in Chinese academia, via a systematic literature review. This article has three main objectives. (1) to identify the most discussed ethical issues of AI in Chinese academia and those being left out (the question of “what”); (2) to analyze the solutions proposed and preferred by Chinese scholars (the question of “how”); and (3) to map out whose voices are dominating and whose are in the marginal (the question of “who”). Findings suggest that in terms of short-term implications, Chinese scholars’ concerns over AI resemble predominantly the content of international ethical guidelines. Yet in terms of long-term implications, there are some significant differences needed to be further addressed in a cultural context. Further, among a wide range of solution proposals, Chinese scholars seem to prefer strong-binding regulations to those weak ethical guidelines. In addition, this article also found that the Chinese academic discourse was dominated by male scholars and those who are from elite universities, which arguably is not a unique phenomenon in China.

Funder

Opetushallitus

University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy

Reference48 articles.

1. Arcesati R (2021) Lofty principles, conflicting incentives: AI ethics and governance in China. https://merics.org/en/report/lofty-principles-conflicting-incentives-ai-ethics-and-governance-china. Accessed 3 July 2021

2. Artificial Intelligence Industry Alliance (2019) Joint Pledge on Self-discipline in the AI Industry. Available from https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/translation-chinese-ai-alliance-drafts-self-discipline-joint-pledge/. Accessed 23 Mar 2021. (Originally in Chinese: 人工智能行业自律公约)

3. Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (2019) Beijing AI Principles. https://www-pre.baai.ac.cn/news/beijing-ai-principles-en.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2021

4. Berggruen Institute (2019) Zeng Yi: A Human-Machine Symbiosis. https://www.berggruen.org/ideas/articles/zeng-yi-a-human-machine-symbiosis/. Accessed 21 Feb 2022

5. Bramer WM (2016) Variation in number of hits for complex searches in Google Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc 104(2):143–145. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.009

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3