Abstract
AbstractSince Chinese scholars are playing an increasingly important role in shaping the national landscape of discussion on AI ethics, understanding their ethical concerns and preferred solutions is essential for global cooperation on governance of AI. This article, therefore, provides the first elaborated analysis on the discourse on AI ethics in Chinese academia, via a systematic literature review. This article has three main objectives. (1) to identify the most discussed ethical issues of AI in Chinese academia and those being left out (the question of “what”); (2) to analyze the solutions proposed and preferred by Chinese scholars (the question of “how”); and (3) to map out whose voices are dominating and whose are in the marginal (the question of “who”). Findings suggest that in terms of short-term implications, Chinese scholars’ concerns over AI resemble predominantly the content of international ethical guidelines. Yet in terms of long-term implications, there are some significant differences needed to be further addressed in a cultural context. Further, among a wide range of solution proposals, Chinese scholars seem to prefer strong-binding regulations to those weak ethical guidelines. In addition, this article also found that the Chinese academic discourse was dominated by male scholars and those who are from elite universities, which arguably is not a unique phenomenon in China.
Funder
Opetushallitus
University of Turku (UTU) including Turku University Central Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Artificial Intelligence,Human-Computer Interaction,Philosophy
Reference48 articles.
1. Arcesati R (2021) Lofty principles, conflicting incentives: AI ethics and governance in China. https://merics.org/en/report/lofty-principles-conflicting-incentives-ai-ethics-and-governance-china. Accessed 3 July 2021
2. Artificial Intelligence Industry Alliance (2019) Joint Pledge on Self-discipline in the AI Industry. Available from https://www.newamerica.org/cybersecurity-initiative/digichina/blog/translation-chinese-ai-alliance-drafts-self-discipline-joint-pledge/. Accessed 23 Mar 2021. (Originally in Chinese: 人工智能行业自律公约)
3. Beijing Academy of Artificial Intelligence (2019) Beijing AI Principles. https://www-pre.baai.ac.cn/news/beijing-ai-principles-en.html. Accessed 23 Mar 2021
4. Berggruen Institute (2019) Zeng Yi: A Human-Machine Symbiosis. https://www.berggruen.org/ideas/articles/zeng-yi-a-human-machine-symbiosis/. Accessed 21 Feb 2022
5. Bramer WM (2016) Variation in number of hits for complex searches in Google Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc 104(2):143–145. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.009
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献