Abstract
AbstractArtificial intelligence (AI) technology poses possible threats to existing jobs. These threats extend not just to the number of jobs available but also to their quality. In the future, so some predict, workers could face fewer and potentially worse jobs, at least if society does not embrace reforms that manage the coming AI revolution. This paper uses the example of Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson’s recent book—Power and Progress (2023)—to illustrate some of the dilemmas and options for managing the future of work under AI. Acemoglu and Johnson, while warning of the potential negative effects of an AI-driven automation, argue that AI can be used for positive ends. In particular, they argue for its uses in creating more ‘good jobs’. This outcome will depend on democratising AI technology. This paper is critical of the approach taken by Acemoglu and Johnson—specifically, it misses the possibility for using AI to lighten work (i.e., to reduce its duration and improve its quality). This paper stresses the potential benefits of automation as a mechanism for lightening work. Its key arguments aim to advance critical debates focused on creating a future in which AI works for people not just for profits.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference37 articles.
1. Acemoglu D (2019) It’s good jobs, stupid’, economics for inclusive prosperity. Available at: https://econfip.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Its-Good-Jobs-Stupid.pdf
2. Acemoglu D (2021) AI’s future doesn’t have to be dystopian, Boston review, May 20th. Available at: https://www.bostonreview.net/forum/ais-future-doesnt-have-to-be-dystopian/
3. Acemoglu D, Johnson S (2023) Power and progress: our thousand-year struggle over technology and prosperity. Basic Books, London
4. Acemoglu D, He A, Le Maire D (2022) Eclipse of rent-seeking: the effects of managers’ education on wages and the labor share in the US and Denmark, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 29874
5. Bellamy Foster J (2017) The meaning of work in a sustainable society. Mon Rev 69(4):1–14