Abstract
AbstractBody representation disorders are complex, varied, striking, and very disabling in most cases. Deficits of body representation have been described after lesions to multimodal and sensorimotor cortical areas. A few studies have reported the effects of tumors on the representation of the body, but little is known about the changes after tumor resection. Moreover, the impact of brain lesions on the hand size representation has been investigated in few clinical cases. Hands are of special importance, as no other body part has the ability for movement and interaction with the environment that the hands have, and we use them for a multitude of daily activities. Studies with clinical population can add further knowledge into the way hands are represented. Here, we report a single case study of a patient (AM) who was an expert bodybuilder and underwent a surgery to remove a glioblastoma in the left posterior prefrontal and precentral cortex at the level of the hand’s motor region. Pre- (20 days) and post- (4 months) surgery assessment did not show any motor or cognitive impairments. A hand localization task was used, before and after surgery (12 months), to measure possible changes of the metric representation of his right hand. Results showed a post-surgery modulation of the typically distorted hand representation, with an overall accuracy improvement, especially on width dimension. These findings support the direct involvement of sensorimotor areas in the implicit representation of the body size and its relevance on defining specific size representation dimensions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference63 articles.
1. Allen JS, Emmorey K, Bruss J, Damasio H (2013) Neuroanatomical differences in visual, motor, and language cortices between congenitally deaf signers, hearing signers, and hearing non-signers. Front Neuroanat 7:1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2013.00026
2. Ambroziak KB, Tamè L, Longo MR (2018) Conceptual distortions of hand structure are robust to changes in stimulus information. Conscious Cogn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.01.002
3. Appollonio I, Leone M, Isella V, Piamarta F, Consoli T, Villa ML, Nichelli P (2005) The frontal assessment battery (FAB): Normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-005-0443-4
4. Arcara G, Bisiacchi PS, Mapelli D, Mondini S, Vestri A (2011) Esame neuropsicologico breve 2 (ENB2): Una batteria di test per lo screening neuropsicologico. R. Cortina, Milano
5. Berlucchi G, Aglioti SM (2010) The body in the brain revisited. Exp Brain Res 200(1):25–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-1970-7