Abstract
AbstractUsing the series of the top 1% income shares in 137 countries, I examine the relationship between top-end inequality and subsequent economic growth from the 1920s to the 2010s. These data enable a versatile exploration of various time horizons. To address concerns regarding chosen functional forms, I employ penalized spline methods to accommodate potential nonlinearities. Empirical findings suggest that the relationship between top-end inequality and subsequent growth is complex, contingent upon both the investigated time horizon and the level of economic development. I find some evidence for a positive link at medium levels of economic development, with this positive link being more pronounced in short- to medium-term associations. I also find that the positive medium-run association weakens as economic development advances. In advanced economies, a negative (or nonpositive) medium- to long-term relationship emerges between the top 1% income share and growth in many settings. Furthermore, I conclude that longer-run associations need to be investigated further.
Funder
Strategic Research Council
Academy of Finland
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference66 articles.
1. Aghion, P., Bolton, P.: A theory of trickle-down growth and development. Rev. Econ. Stud. 64(2), 151–172 (1997)
2. Aghion, P., Caroli, E., García-Peñalosa, C.: Inequality and economic growth: The perspective of the new growth theories. J. Econ. Lit. 37(4), 1615–1660 (1999)
3. Ahamada, I., Flachaire, E.: Non-Parametric Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
4. Aiyar, S., Ebeke, C.: Inequality of opportunity, inequality of income and economic growth. World Dev. 136, 105115 (2020)
5. Alesina, A., Rodrik, D.: Distributive politics and economic growth. Q. J. Econ. 109(2), 465–490 (1994)