Author:
Costa-Font Joan,Cowell Frank A.
Abstract
AbstractApproaches to measuring health inequalities are often problematic because they use methods that are inappropriate for categorical data. In this paper we focus on “pure” or univariate health inequality (rather than income-related or bivariate health inequality) and use a concept of individual status that allows a consistent treatment of such data. We take alternative versions of the status concept and apply methods for treating categorical data to examine self-assessed health inequality for the countries included in the World Health Survey. We also use regression analysis on the apparent determinants of these health inequality estimates. We show that the status concept that is used will affect health-inequality rankings across countries and the way health inequality is related to countries’ median health, income, demographics and governance.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,Sociology and Political Science
Reference50 articles.
1. Abul Naga, R H, Yalcin, T: Inequality measurement for ordered response health data. J. Health Econ. 27, 1614–1625 (2008)
2. Abul Naga, R H, Yalcin, T: Median independent inequality orderings. Technical, University of Aberdeen Business School (2010)
3. Allison, R A, Foster, J E: Measuring health inequality using qualitative data. J. Health Econ. 23, 505–552 (2004)
4. Asada, Y, Hurley, J, Norheim, O F, Johri, M: A three-stage approach to measuring health inequalities and inequities. Int. J. Equity Health 13, 98 (2014)
5. Bleichrodt, H, van Doorslaer, E: A welfare economics foundation for health inequality measurement. J. Health Econ. 25, 945–957 (2006)
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献