Predictive structure building in language comprehension: a large sample study on incremental licensing and parallelism

Author:

Fujita HirokiORCID

Abstract

AbstractIn online language comprehension, the parser incrementally builds hierarchical syntactic structures. The predictive nature of this structure-building process has been the subject of extensive debate. A previous study observed that when a wh-phrase indicates parallelism between the upcoming wh-clause and a preceding clause (e.g.,John told some stories, but we couldn’t remember which stories…), the parser predictively constructs the wh-clause. This observation demonstrates predictive structure building. However, the study also suggests that the parser does not make a prediction when the wh-phrase indicates that parallelism does not hold (e.g.,John told some stories … with which stories…), a potential limit to the prediction of syntactic structures. Crucially, these findings are controversial because the study did not observe processing difficulty when disambiguating input indicated that the predicted continuation was inconsistent with the globally grammatical structure (garden-path effects). The controversial results may be due to a lack of statistical power. Therefore, the present study conducted a large-scale replication study (324 participants and 24 sets of materials). The results revealed that the parser predicts the clausal structure, irrespective of the type of wh-phrase. There was also evidence of garden-path effects, supporting the finding that the parser makes a prediction. These observations suggest that the prediction algorithm inherent in the human parser is more powerful than assumed by the previous study and that the parser attempts to construct globally grammatical structures during revision.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Universität Potsdam

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine

Reference83 articles.

1. Abney SP (1986) Licensing and parsing. North East Linguist Soc 17(1):1–15

2. Ackerman L, Kazanina N, Yoshida M (2015) Does the cataphoric dependency formation help the parser resolve local ambiguity? [Poster]. In: The 28th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, University of Southern California

3. Aho AV, Ullman JD (1972) The theory of parsing, translation, and compiling. Prentice-Hall

4. Altmann G, Steedman M (1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30(3):191–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90020-0

5. Aoshima S, Phillips C, Weinberg A (2004) Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final language. J Mem Lang 51(1):23–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.001

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3