Behaviour Change Techniques in Computerized Cognitive Training for Cognitively Healthy Older Adults: A Systematic Review
-
Published:2022-02-14
Issue:1
Volume:33
Page:238-254
-
ISSN:1040-7308
-
Container-title:Neuropsychology Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neuropsychol Rev
Author:
Peeters GeeskeORCID, Black Irene L., Gomersall Sjaan R., Fritschi Juliette, Sweeney Aoife, Guedes de Oliveira Yasmin, Panizzutti Rogerio, McEvoy Claire T., Lampit Amit
Abstract
AbstractWe aimed to describe behaviour change techniques (BCT) used in trials evaluating computerised cognitive training (CCT) in cognitively healthy older adults, and explore whether BCTs are associated with improved adherence and efficacy. The 90 papers included in a recent meta-analysis were reviewed for information about adherence and use of BCTs in accordance with the Behaviour Change Taxonomy. Studies using a specific BCT were compared with studies not using that BCT on efficacy (difference in Hedges’ g [Δg]) using three level meta-regression models and on median adherence using the Wilcoxon test. The median number of BCTs per study was 3 (interquartile range [IQR] = 2–5). ‘Feedback on behaviour’ (if provided by a person; Δg = -0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.31;-0.07) and ‘non-specific reward’ (Δg = -0.19, CI = -0.34;-0.05) were associated with lower efficacy. Certain BCTs that involve personal contact may be beneficial, although none were statistically significantly associated with greater efficacy. The median percentage of adherence was 90% (IQR = 81–95). Adherence was higher in studies using the BCT ‘self-monitoring of behaviour’ and lower in studies using the BCT ‘graded tasks’ than studies not using these BCTs (p < 0.001). These findings provide first evidence that BCTs can influence both adherence to and efficacy of CCT programs in cognitively healthy older adults.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference107 articles.
1. Ackerman, P. L., Kanfer, R., & Calderwood, C. (2010). Use it or lose it? Wii brain exercise practice and reading for domain knowledge. Psychol Aging, 25(4), 753–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019277 2. Anguera, J. A., Boccanfuso, J., Rintoul, J. L., Al-Hashimi, O., Faraji, F., Janowich, J., et al. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501(7465), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12486 3. Ball, K., Berch, D. B., Helmers, K. F., Jobe, J. B., Leveck, M. D., Marsiske, M., et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288(18), 2271–2281. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.288.18.2271 4. Ballesteros, S., Mayas, J., Prieto, A., Ruiz-Marquez, E., Toril, P., & Reales, J. M. (2017). Effects of Video Game Training on Measures of Selective Attention and Working Memory in Older Adults: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 9, 354. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00354 5. Ballesteros, S., Prieto, A., Mayas, J., Toril, P., Pita, C., Ponce de Leon, L., et al. (2014). Brain training with non-action video games enhances aspects of cognition in older adults: A randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, 277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00277
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|