Hemispheric Asymmetry in TMS-Induced Effects on Spatial Attention: A Meta-Analysis
-
Published:2023-09-22
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:1040-7308
-
Container-title:Neuropsychology Review
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Neuropsychol Rev
Author:
Wang TingORCID, de Graaf Tom, Tanner Lisabel, Schuhmann Teresa, Duecker Felix, Sack Alexander T.
Abstract
AbstractHemispheric asymmetry is a fundamental principle in the functional architecture of the brain. It plays an important role in attention research where right hemisphere dominance is core to many attention theories. Lesion studies seem to confirm such hemispheric dominance with patients being more likely to develop left hemineglect after right hemispheric stroke than vice versa. However, the underlying concept of hemispheric dominance is still not entirely clear. Brain stimulation studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) might be able to illuminate this concept. To examine the putative hemispheric asymmetry in spatial attention, we conducted a meta-analysis of studies applying inhibitory TMS protocols to the left or right posterior parietal cortices (PPC), assessing effects on attention biases with the landmark and line bisection task. A total of 18 studies including 222 participants from 1994 to February 2022 were identified. The analysis revealed a significant shift of the perceived midpoint towards the ipsilateral hemifield after right PPC suppression (Cohen’s d = 0.52), but no significant effect after left PPC suppression (Cohen’s d = 0.26), suggesting a hemispheric asymmetry even though the subgroup difference does not reach significance (p = .06). A complementary Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a high probability of at least a medium effect size after right PPC disruption versus a low probability after left PPC disruption. This is the first quantitative meta-analysis supporting right hemisphere-specific TMS-induced spatial attention deficits, mimicking hemineglect in healthy participants. We discuss the result in the light of prominent attention theories, ultimately concluding how difficult it remains to differentiate between these theories based on attentional bias scores alone.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference61 articles.
1. Babiloni, C., Vecchio, F., Rossi, S., De Capua, A., Bartalini, S., Ulivelli, M., & Rossini, P. M. (2007). Human ventral parietal cortex plays a functional role on visuospatial attention and primary consciousness. A repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Cerebral Cortex, 17(6), 1486–1492. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl060 2. Bagattini, C., Mele, S., Brignani, D., & Savazzi, S. (2015). No causal effect of left hemisphere hyperactivity in the genesis of neglect-like behavior. Neuropsychologia, 72, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.010 3. Beis, J. M., Keller, C., Morin, N., Bartolomeo, P., Bernati, T., Chokron, S., et al. (2004). Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: Qualitative and quantitative study. Neurology, 63(9), 1600–1605. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000142967.60579.32 4. Bjoertomt, O., Cowey, A., & Walsh, V. (2002). Spatial neglect in near and far space investigated by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain, 125(Pt 9), 2012–2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awf211 5. Brighina, F., Bisiach, E., Piazza, A., Oliveri, M., La Bua, V., Daniele, O., & Fierro, B. (2002). Perceptual and response bias in visuospatial neglect due to frontal and parietal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in normal subjects. NeuroReport, 13(18), 2571–2575. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200212200-00038
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|