Abstract
AbstractAphasia is an impairment of language caused by acquired brain damage such as stroke or traumatic brain injury, that affects a person’s ability to communicate effectively. The aim of rehabilitation in aphasia is to improve everyday communication, improving an individual’s ability to function in their day-to-day life. For that reason, a thorough understanding of naturalistic communication and its underlying mechanisms is imperative. The field of aphasiology currently lacks an agreed, comprehensive, theoretically founded definition of communication. Instead, multiple disparate interpretations of functional communication are used. We argue that this makes it nearly impossible to validly and reliably assess a person’s communicative performance, to target this behaviour through therapy, and to measure improvements post-therapy. In this article we propose a structured, theoretical approach to defining the concept of functional communication. We argue for a view of communication as “situated language use”, borrowed from empirical psycholinguistic studies with non-brain damaged adults. This framework defines language use as: (1) interactive, (2) multimodal, and (3) contextual. Existing research on each component of the framework from non-brain damaged adults and people with aphasia is reviewed. The consequences of adopting this approach to assessment and therapy for aphasia rehabilitation are discussed. The aim of this article is to encourage a more systematic, comprehensive approach to the study and treatment of situated language use in aphasia.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference461 articles.
1. Adjei-Nicol, S. K. (2020). An investigation into the effect of a novel non-linguistic cognitive intervention on functional communication in global aphasia. PhD thesis, UCL (University College London).
2. Alexander, H. (1988). The Language and Logic of Philosophy. University Press Of America.
3. Almaghyuli, A., Thompson, H., Ralph, M. A. L., & Jefferies, E. (2012). Deficits of semantic control produce absent or reverse frequency effects in comprehension: Evidence from neuropsychology and dual task methodology. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1968–1979.
4. Alyahya, R., Halai, A., Conroy, P., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). The behavioural patterns and neural correlates of concrete and abstract verb processing in aphasia: A novel verb semantic battery. NeuroImage: Clinical, 17:811–825.
5. Argyle, M., & Cook, M. (1976). Gaze and Mutual Gaze. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cited by
35 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献