Abstract
Abstract
Purpose
The paper present findings from an in vitro experimental study of a stentless human aortic bioprosthesis (HAB) made of bacterial cellulose (BC). Three variants of the basic model were designed and tested to identify the valve prosthesis with the best performance parameters. The modified models were made of BC, and the basic model of pericardium.
Methods
Each model (named V1, V2 and V3) was implanted into a 90 mm porcine aorta. Effective Orifice Area (EOA), rapid valve opening time (RVOT) and rapid valve closing time (RVCT) were determined. The flow resistance of each bioprosthesis model during the simulated heart systole, i.e. for the mean differential pressure (ΔP) at the time of full valve opening was measured. All experimental specimens were exposed to a mean blood pressure (MBP) of 90.5 ± 2.3 mmHg.
Results
The V3 model demonstrated the best performance. The index defining the maximum opening of the bioprosthesis during systole for models V1, V2 and V3 was 2.67 ± 0.59, 2.04 ± 0.23 and 2.85 ± 0.59 cm2, respectively. The mean flow rate through the V3 valve was 5.7 ± 1, 6.9 ± 0.7 and 8.9 ± 1.4 l/min for stroke volume (SV) of 65, 90 and 110 mL, respectively. The phase of immediate opening and closure for models V1, V2 and V3 was 8, 7 and 5% of the cycle duration, respectively. The mean flow resistance of the models was: 4.07 ± 2.1, 4.28 ± 2.51 and 5.6 ± 2.32 mmHg.
Conclusions
The V3 model of the aortic valve prosthesis is the most effective. In vivo tests using BC as a structural material for this model are recommended. The response time of the V3 model to changed work conditions is comparable to that of a healthy human heart. The model functions as an aortic valve prosthesis in in vitro conditions.
Funder
Narodowe Centrum Badań i Rozwoju
Ship Design & Research Centre
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Biomedical Engineering
Reference38 articles.
1. Akutsu, T., B. Dreyer, and W. J. Kolff. Polyurethane artificial heart valves in animals. J. Appl. Physiol. 14:1045–1048, 1959. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1959.14.6.1045.
2. Beholz, S., A. Repossini, U. Livi, et al. The freedom SOLO valve for aortic valve replacement: clinical and hemodynamic results from a prospective multicenter trial. J. Heart Valve Dis. 19(1):115–123, 2010.
3. Boffito, M., S. Sartori, C. Mattu, and G. Ciardelli. Polyurethanes for cardiac applications. Adv. Polyurethane Biomater. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100614-6.00013-5.
4. Bortolotti, U., G. Scioti, A. Milano, et al. The Edwards prima stentless valve: hemodynamic performance at one year. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 68(6):2147–2151, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00830-9.
5. Brown, J. M., S. M. O’Brien, C. Wu, et al. Isolated aortic valve replacement in North America comprising 108,687 patients in 10 years: changes in risks, valve types, and outcomes in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 137(1):82–90, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.015.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献