The DNA damage response to radiological imaging: from ROS and γH2AX foci induction to gene expression responses in vivo

Author:

López-Riego MilagrosaORCID,Płódowska Magdalena,Lis-Zajęcka Milena,Jeziorska Kamila,Tetela Sylwia,Węgierek-Ciuk Aneta,Sobota Daniel,Braziewicz Janusz,Lundholm Lovisa,Lisowska Halina,Wojcik Andrzej

Abstract

AbstractCandidate ionising radiation exposure biomarkers must be validated in humans exposed in vivo. Blood from patients undergoing positron emission tomography–computed tomography scan (PET-CT) and skeletal scintigraphy (scintigraphy) was drawn before (0 h) and after (2 h) the procedure for correlation analyses of the response of selected biomarkers with radiation dose and other available patient information. FDXR, CDKN1A, BBC3, GADD45A, XPC, and MDM2 expression was determined by qRT-PCR, DNA damage (γH2AX) by flow cytometry, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels by flow cytometry using the 2′, 7′—dichlorofluorescein diacetate test in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). For ROS experiments, 0- and 2-h samples were additionally exposed to UVA to determine whether diagnostic irradiation conditioned the response to further oxidative insult. With some exceptions, radiological imaging induced weak γH2AX foci, ROS and gene expression fold changes, the latter with good coherence across genes within a patient. Diagnostic imaging did not influence oxidative stress in PBMC successively exposed to UVA. Correlation analyses with patient characteristics led to low correlation coefficient values. γH2AX fold change, which correlated positively with gene expression, presented a weak positive correlation with injected activity, indicating a radiation-induced subtle increase in DNA damage and subsequent activation of the DNA damage response pathway. The exposure discrimination potential of these biomarkers in the absence of control samples as frequently demanded in radiological emergencies, was assessed using raw data. These results suggest that the variability of the response in heterogeneous populations might complicate identifying individuals exposed to low radiation doses.

Funder

Swedish Radiation Safety Authority

Stockholm University

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

General Environmental Science,Radiation,Biophysics

Reference121 articles.

1. Abend M, Badie C, Quintens R, Kriehuber R, Manning G, Macaeva E, Njima M, Oskamp D, Strunz S, Moertl S, Doucha-Senf S, Dahlke S, Menzel J, Port M (2016) Examining radiation-induced in vivo and in vitro gene expression changes of the peripheral blood in different laboratories for biodosimetry purposes: first RENEB gene expression study. Radiat Res 185(2):109–123. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR14221.1

2. Abend M, Amundson SA, Badie C, Brzoska K, Hargitai R, Kriehuber R, Schule S, Kis E, Ghandhi SA, Lumniczky K, Morton SR, O’Brien G, Oskamp D, Ostheim P, Siebenwirth C, Shuryak I, Szatmari T, Unverricht-Yeboah M, Ainsbury E, Bassinet C, Kulka U, Oestreicher U, Ristic Y, Trompier F, Wojcik A, Waldner L, Port M (2021) Inter-laboratory comparison of gene expression biodosimetry for protracted radiation exposures as part of the RENEB and EURADOS WG10 2019 exercise. Sci Rep 11(1):9756. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88403-4

3. Abend M, Amundson SA, Badie C, Brzoska K, Kriehuber R, Lacombe J, Lopez-Riego M, Lumniczky K, Endesfelder D, O’Brien G, Doucha-Senf S, Ghandhi SA, Hargitai R, Kis E, Lundholm L, Oskamp D, Ostheim P, Schule S, Schwanke D, Shuryak I, Siebenwith C, Unverricht-Yeboah M, Wojcik A, Yang J, Zenhausern F, Port M (2023) RENEB inter-laboratory comparison 2021: the gene expression assay. Radiat Res. https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-22-00206.1

4. Adimoolam S, Ford JM (2002) p53 and DNA damage-inducible expression of the xeroderma pigmentosum group C gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(20):12985–12990. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.202485699

5. Agbenyegah S, Abend M, Atkinson MJ, Combs SE, Trott KR, Port M, Majewski M (2018) Impact of inter-individual variance in the expression of a radiation-responsive gene panel used for triage. Radiat Res 190(3):226–235. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR15013.1

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3