Author:
Kastl Manuel,Grémy Olivier,Lamart Stephanie,Giussani Augusto,Li Wei Bo,Hoeschen Christoph
Abstract
AbstractA major challenge in modelling the decorporation of actinides (An), such as americium (Am), with DTPA (diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid) is the fact that standard biokinetic models become inadequate for assessing radionuclide intake and estimating the resulting dose, as DTPA perturbs the regular biokinetics of the radionuclide. At present, most attempts existing in the literature are empirical and developed mainly for the interpretation of one or a limited number of specific incorporation cases. Recently, several approaches have been presented with the aim of developing a generic model, one of which reported the unperturbed biokinetics of plutonium (Pu), the chelation process and the behaviour of the chelated compound An–DTPA with a single model structure. The aim of the approach described in this present work is the development of a generic model that is able to describe the biokinetics of Am, DTPA and the chelate Am–DTPA simultaneously. Since accidental intakes in humans present many unknowns and large uncertainties, data from controlled studies in animals were used. In these studies, different amounts of DTPA were administered at different times after contamination with known quantities of Am. To account for the enhancement of faecal excretion and reduction in liver retention, DTPA is assumed to chelate Am not only in extracellular fluids, but also in hepatocytes. A good agreement was found between the predictions of the proposed model and the experimental results for urinary and faecal excretion and accumulation and retention in the liver. However, the decorporation from the skeletal compartment could not be reproduced satisfactorily under these simple assumptions.
Funder
Helmholtz Zentrum München - Deutsches Forschungszentrum für Gesundheit und Umwelt (GmbH)
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
General Environmental Science,Radiation,Biophysics
Reference74 articles.
1. Bailey BR, Eckerman KF, Townsend LW (2003) An analysis of a puncture wound case with medical intervention. Radiat Prot Dosim 105:509–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006293. (PMID: 14527019)
2. Ballou JE, Hess JO (1972) Biliary plutonium excretion in the rat. Health Phys 22(4):369–372. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004032-197204000-00008
3. Barrett PH, Bell BM, Cobelli C, Golde H, Schumitzky A, Vicini P, Foster DM (1998) SAAM II: Simulation, analysis and modeling software of tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. Metabolism 47:484–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-0495(98)90064-6
4. Bertelli L, Waters TL, Miller G, Gadd MS, Eaton MC, Guilmette RA (2010) Three plutonium chelation cases at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Health Phys 99:532–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/hp.0b013e3181d18c61. (PMID: 20838095)
5. Bertelli L, Poudel D, Klumpp J, Waters T (2018) A method for tracking a case under chelation using urinary excretion measurements. In: 12th International Conference on the health effects of incorporated radionuclides (HEIR conference); 8–11 October 2018; Fontenay-aux-Roses, France. Les Ulis, France; EDP Sciences; 2018:02005.