Author:
Gorrochategui-Ortega June,Muñoz-Colmenero Marta,Galartza Egoitz,Estonba Andone,Zarraonaindia Iratxe
Abstract
AbstractThe Varroa destructor mite causes severe losses of Apis mellifera colonies, requiring recurring treatments. One such treatment is oxalic acid (OA), considered ecological. However, it is unclear whether OA affects the honey bee gut microbiota or other hive-associated microbiotas. Herein, we studied the effect of three OA treatments (trickling at 2.1% or 4.2%, and sublimation through Varrox®) upon microbial communities associated with workers’ gut, hive bee bread and pupae, sampled from conventionally or ecologically managed colonies under different anthropization levels (located in urban, rural or mountainous landscapes). We hypothesized that treatment with OA would impact the diversity and composition of bacteria and/or eukaryotic communities, and that the effect would be dose-dependent and specific to the beehive niche. Results showed that the microbiomes of apiaries under different anthropization levels and management strategies differed prior to OA application. Neither the bacterial nor the fungal communities of bee bread and pupae shifted due to OA treatment. Independent of the dosage and the application method (trickling or sublimation), OA induced slight compositional changes in the bacterial profiles of honeybee guts. Those changes were stronger the higher the anthropization (in colonies from urban areas under conventional management). OA treatment reduced the relative abundance of several pathogens, such as Nosema ceranae, and decreased the overall bacterial diversity down to values found in less anthropized colonies. Thus, our results suggest that, aside from managing Varroa infestations, OA could have beneficial effects for stressed colonies while not impairing honey bee resilience from a microbial point of view.
Funder
Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food of the Basque Government
Universidad del País Vasco
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference72 articles.
1. Abarenkov K, Zirk A, Piirmann T, Pöhönen R, Ivanov F, Nilsson RH, et al (2021). UNITE QIIME release for eukaryotes 2. Version 10.05.2021. UNITE Community. https://doi.plutof.ut.ee/doi/https://doi.org/10.15156/BIO/1264861
2. Adjlane N, Tarek EO, Haddad N (2016) Evaluation of Oxalic Acid Treatments against the Mite Varroa destructor and Secondary Effects on Honey Bees Apis mellifera. J Arthropod-Borne Dis 10(4):501–9. PMID: 28032102; PMCID: PMC5186740. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5186740/
3. Alaux C, Brunet JL, Dussaubat C, Mondet F, Tchamitchan S, Cousin M et al (2010) Interactions between Nosema microspores and a neonicotinoid weaken honeybees (Apis mellifera). Environ Microbiol 12(3):774–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02123.x
4. Blot N, Veillat L, Rouzé R, Delatte H (2019) Glyphosate, but not its metabolite AMPA, alters the honeybee gut microbiota. PLoS ONE 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215466
5. Bogdanov S, Charrière JD, Imdorf A, Kilchenmann V, Fluri P (2002) Determination of residues in honey after treatments with formic and oxalic acid under field conditions. Apidologie 33(4):399–409. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2002029