Author:
Kuper N. K.,Opdam N. J. M.,Huysmans M. C. D. N. J. M.
Reference36 articles.
1. Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitao J, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138(6):775–83.
2. Bollet-Quivogne FR, Anderson P, Dowker SE, Elliott JC. Scanning microradiographic study on the influence of diffusion in the external liquid on the rate of demineralization in hydroxyapatite aggregates. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113(1):53–9.
3. Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T, Cury JA, Cate JM ten. Relationship between gap size and dentine secondary caries formation assessed in a microcosm biofilm model. Caries Res. 2009;43(2):97–102.
4. Fucio SB de, Puppin-Rontani RM, Carvalho FG de, Mattos-Graner RO de, Correr-Sobrinho L, Garcia-Godoy F. Analyses of biofilms accumulated on dental restorative materials. Am J Dent. 2009;22(3):131–6.
5. Dérand T, Birkhed D, Edwardsson S. Secondary caries related to various marginal gaps around amalgam restorations in vitro. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1991;15(3):133–8.