Abstract
AbstractMoney laundering has ascended the enforcement and criminological agenda in the course of this century, and has been accompanied by an increased focus on legal professionals as ‘enablers’ of crime. This article explores the dynamics of this enforcement, media and political agenda, and how the legal profession has responded in the UK and elsewhere, within the context of ignoring the difficulties of judging the effectiveness of anti money laundering. It concludes that legal responses are a function of their lobbying power, the determination of governments to clamp down on the toxic impacts of legal structures, and different legal cultures. However, it remains unclear what the effects on the levels and organization of serious crimes for gain are of controls on the professions.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference51 articles.
1. Antonopoulos GA, Hall A, Large J, Shen A (2019) Counterfeit goods fraud: an account of its financial management. Eur J Crim Policy Res:1–22
2. Beioley K (2020a) Top City lawyer rejects hacking allegations in wealth fund dispute. https://www.ft.com/content/a7d37546-41d7-11ea-bdb5-169ba7be433d, 28 January 2020. Accessed 22 Oct 2020
3. Beioley K (2020b) Top lawyer in ENRC fraud case to retire from law firm Dechert https://www.ft.com/content/e7457d5b-823f-4ae7-90bb-e6271313d44b, 26 August 2020. Accessed 22 Oct 2020
4. Bell D (1953) Crime as an American way of life. Antioch Rev 13(2):131–154. https://doi.org/10.2307/4609623
5. Belton C (2020) Putin's people: how the KGB took back Russia and then took on the West. William Collins, London
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献