Author:
Atasever Umut,Jerrim John,Tieck Sabine
Abstract
AbstractCross-national comparisons of educational achievement rely upon each participating country collecting nationally representative data. While obtaining high response rates is a key part of reaching this goal, other potentially important factors may also be at play. This paper focuses on one such issue—exclusion rates—which has received relatively little attention in the academic literature. Using data from 20 years of international large-scale assessment data, we find there to be modest variation in exclusion rates across countries and that there has been a relatively small increase in exclusion rates in some over time. We also demonstrate how exclusion rates tend to be higher in studies of primary students than in studies of secondary students. Finally, while there seems to be little relationship between exclusion rates and response rates, there is a weak negative association between the level of exclusions and test performance. We conclude by discussing how information about exclusions—and other similar issues—might be more clearly communicated to non-specialist audiences.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference9 articles.
1. Anders, J., Has, S., Jerrim, J., et al. (2021). Is Canada really an education superpower? The impact of non-participation on results from PISA 2015. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33, 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09329
2. Durrant, G., & Schnepf, S. (2018). Which schools and pupils respond to educational achievement surveys? A focus on the English Programme for international student assessment sample. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 181(4), 1057–1075.
3. Education Datalab. (2017). Why does Vietnam do so well in PISA? An example of why naive interpretation of international rankings is such a bad idea Accessed 05/05/2022 from https://ffteducationdatalab.org.uk/2017/07/why-does-vietnam-do-so-well-in-pisa-an-example-of-why-naive-interpretation-of-international-rankings-is-such-a-bad-idea/.
4. Jerrim, J. (2021). PISA 2018 in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales: Is the data really representative of all four corners of the UK? The Review of Education, 9, e3270. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3270
5. Martin, M, von Davier, M, & Mullis, I. (2020). TIMSS 2019 technical report.