Abstract
AbstractAcross the world, teachers’ classroom assessment tasks and responsibilities are becoming more diverse due to increased migration. In this review, we address how migrant students are affected by assessment, both summative and formative, at the classroom level, with a focus on culturally responsive assessment (CRA). Previous research has shown that CRA practices mainly occur in student-centred classrooms. Furthermore, both student and teacher beliefs about teaching and learning might negatively affect migrant students’ opportunities to engage in assessment situations. Teaching and assessment practices should be negotiated and aligned with and included in classroom norms to be culturally responsive. We propose that what is generally considered a valid and reliable assessment practice might need to be adjusted to account for students’ cultural ways of knowing and participating and how this is expressed and communicated within the classroom.
Funder
Oslo University & Oslo University Hospital
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Education
Reference104 articles.
1. American Evaluation Association (AEA) (2011). Statement on cultural competence on evaluation. http://www.eval.org/p/cm/ld/fid=92. Accessed 1 Apr 2019.
2. Arikan, S., van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Yagmur, K. (2017). PISA mathematics and reading performance differences of mainstream European and Turkish immigrant students. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-017-9260-6.
3. Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B., & Spotti, M. (2016). Introduction: superdiversity and sociolinguistics. In B. Rampton & J. Blommaert (Eds.), Language and superdiversity (pp. 31–58). London: Routledge.
4. Aronson, B., & Laughter, J. (2016). The theory and practice of culturally relevant education: a synthesis of research across content areas. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 163–206.
5. Ayalon, H., & Livneh, I. (2013). Educational standardization and gender differences in mathematics achievement: a comparative study. Social Science Research, 42(2), 432–445.
Cited by
39 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献