Abstract
AbstractThis narrative review describes a new approach to navigation in a challenging landscape of clinical drug development in diabetes. Successful outcome studies in recent years have led to new indications and guidelines in type 2 diabetes, yet the number of clinical trials in diabetes is now declining. This is due to many environmental factors acting in concert, including the prioritisation of funding for other diseases, high costs of large randomised clinical trials, increase in regulatory requirements and limited entry of novel candidate drugs. There is a need for novel and cost-effective paradigms of clinical development to meet these and other challenges. The concept of registry-based randomised clinical trials (RRCTs) is an attractive option. In this review we focus on type 2 diabetes and the prevention of cardiovascular and microvascular comorbidities and mortality, using the Swedish SMARTEST trial as an example of an RRCT. We also give some examples from other disease areas. The RRCT concept is a novel, cost-effective and scientifically sound approach for conducting large-scale diabetes trials in a real-world setting.
Graphical abstract
Funder
ALF grants
EXODIAB
Linné grant
VINNOVA
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Swedish Heart and Lung Foundation
Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism,Internal Medicine
Reference60 articles.
1. World Health Organization (2022) Number of clinical trial registrations by location, disease, phase of development, age and sex of trial participants (1999–2021). Available at: www.who.int/observatories/global-observatory-on-health-research-and-development/monitoring/number-of-trial-registrations-by-year-location-disease-and-phase-of-development. Accessed 28 Apr 2022
2. Otmani M (2018) New report shows a severe decline in Swedish clinical drug trials. Available at: https://nordiclifescience.org/new-report-shows-a-severe-decline-in-swedish-clinical-drug-trials/. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
3. DeVito N (2019) UK Trials and Brexit. Oxford DataLab. Available at: www.bennett.ox.ac.uk/blog/2019/08/uk-trials-and-brexit-an-update/. Accessed 10 Jan 2022
4. Hansen LJ, Siersma V, Beck-Nielsen H, de Fine Olivarius N (2013) Structured personal care of type 2 diabetes: a 19 year follow-up of the study Diabetes Care in General Practice (DCGP). Diabetologia 56(6):1243–1253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-013-2893-1
5. Sanchez A, Silvestre C, Campo N, Grandes G, Pred DEG (2018) Effective translation of a type-2 diabetes primary prevention programme into routine primary care: The PreDE cluster randomised clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 139:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2018.01.006
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献