Predicting Toxicological and Ecotoxicological Endpoints-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Predicting Toxicological and Ecotoxicological Endpoints

Published:2007 Issue: Volume: Page:427-465
ISSN:
Container-title:Risk Assessment of Chemicals
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Worth A.P.,Netzeva T.I.,Patlewicz G.

Publisher

Springer Netherlands

Link

http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-1-4020-6102-8_10.pdf

Reference223 articles.

1. Livingstone DJ. 2004. Building QSAR models: a practical guide. In Predicting Chemical Toxicity and Fate. Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ, eds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA. pp. 151-170.

2. Cronin MTD, Schultz TW. 2003. Pitfalls in QSAR. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem) 622:39-51.

3. Kubinyi, H. 1993. QSAR: Hansch analysis and related approaches. VCH, Weinheim, Germany.

4. Livingstone DJ. 1995. Data Analysis for Chemists: applications to QSAR and chemical product design. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

5. Kier LB, Hall LH. 1986. Molecular connectiviy in structure-activity analysis. Res. Studio Press Ltd, Letchworth, UK.

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Chemometric Modeling of Pesticide Aquatic Toxicity;Chemometrics and Cheminformatics in Aquatic Toxicology;2021-10-13

2. Chemometric Modeling of Algal and Daphnia Toxicity;Chemometrics and Cheminformatics in Aquatic Toxicology;2021-10-13

3. In silico prediction of chemical aquatic toxicity for marine crustaceans via machine learning;Toxicology Research;2019

4. The Adverse Outcome Pathway Concept: A Basis for Developing Regulatory Decision-making Tools;Alternatives to Laboratory Animals;2016-10

5. Current and Future Perspectives on the Development, Evaluation, and Application of in Silico Approaches for Predicting Toxicity;Chemical Research in Toxicology;2016-01-06