Author:
Aufschnaiter Claudia von,Erduran Sibel,Osborne Jonathan,Simon Shirley
Reference27 articles.
1. Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms.it Science Education, 84(3), 287–312.
2. Duit, R. (2006). Bibliography – STCSE: Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions and Science Education.Retreived June 2006, from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html
3. Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science – from behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. (In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 3–25). Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer.)
4. Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. it International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688.
5. Erduran, S., Simon, S. & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin’s argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915–933.
Cited by
6 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献