Abstract
AbstractThe United Nations' (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) are a recognised metric for measuring environmental, economic, and societal progress. However, national or multinational-level analyses are more prevalent than sub-national types. The performance of 14 SDGs for 56 Indian cities (grouped into 6 regions) with the available 77 indicators (2020–2021) have been analysed. Pearson’s correlation, hierarchical clustering, data envelopment analysis, Theil index, etc. were used to infer existing status, interactions, inequality, efficiency, and interrelationships. Finally, policy suggestions have been offered coupled with limitations to mitigate the drawbacks of the Indian city SDG framework. The findings reveal the asynchronous nature of the SDGs. 18% of Indian cities register a poor track record of converting environmental performance into socioeconomic prosperity, while 55% of cities are lagging in performance compared to their respective states. Significant inequality exists among cities in various regions towards achieving the SDGs. The environment is adversely affected in a race to be economically powerful. So, mainstreaming the environment into development planning is urgently warranted.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Energy (miscellaneous),Environmental Science (miscellaneous),Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference45 articles.
1. Urban population (% of total population) – India. World Development Indicators, World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS?locations=IN. Accessed 16th Apr 2023.
2. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. https://www.unep.org/resources/report/climate-change-2021-physical-science-basis-working-group-i-contribution-sixth. Accessed 16th Apr 2023.
3. Simon D, Arfvidsson H, Anand G, Bazaz A, Fenna G, Foster K, Jain G, Hansson S, et al. Developing and testing the Urban Sustainable Development Goal’s targets and indicators–a five-city study. Environ Urban. 2016;28(1):49–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247815619865.
4. Arfvidsson H, Simon D, Oloko M, Moodley N. Engaging with and measuring informality in the proposed Urban Sustainable Development Goal. Afr Geogr Rev. 2017;36(1):100–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2015.1130636.
5. Patel Z, Greyling S, Simon D, Arfvidsson H, Moodley N, Primo N, Wright C. Local responses to global sustainability agendas: learning from experimenting with the urban sustainable development goal in Cape Town. Sustain Sci. 2017;12:785–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0500-y.