Abstract
AbstractBeef production systems are at the center of ongoing discussion and debate on food systems sustainability. There is a growing interest among beef producers, consumers, and other beef supply chain stakeholders in achieving greater sustainability within the industry, but the relationship of this interest to general sustainability issues such as climate change, biodiversity loss, food security, livelihood risks, and animal welfare concerns is unclear. Specifically, there is very little research documenting how beef producers define and view the concept of sustainability and how to achieve it. Producer perspectives are critical to identifying constraints to sustainability transitions or to help build agreement with other producers about the shared values such transitions may support. Through a secondary analysis of survey data of U.S. beef producers (n = 911) conducted in 2021 by the Trust in Food division of Farm Journal, a corporation that provides content, data, and business insights to the agricultural community (e.g., producers, processors/distributors, and retailers), we investigated what “sustainable beef” means to U.S. beef producers, highlighting the key components and constraints they perceive to achieving desirable sustainability outcomes. Leveraging the three-pillar model of sustainability as a framework for analysis, we identified key themes producers use to define “sustainable beef.” We found that producers collectively viewed sustainability as: (1) multidimensional and interconnected; (2) semi-closed and regenerative; (3) long-lasting; and (4) producer-centered, although an integrated perspective uniting these aspects was rare. We discuss how these perspectives may be the basis for sustainability efforts supported by producers and raise future research considerations toward a shared understanding of what sustainability is and what is needed for enduring sustainability solutions in the U.S. beef industry.
Funder
United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture
National Science Foundation Division of Graduate Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A. Climate change 2022 impacts, adaptation and vulnerability working group II contribution to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC; 2022. www.ipcc.ch.
2. Maestre FT, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge DJ, Saiz H, Berdugo M, et al. Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands. Science. 2022;378(6622):915–20. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abq4062.
3. Eldridge DJ, Delgado-Baquerizo M. Continental-scale impacts of livestock grazing on ecosystem supporting and regulating services. Land Degrad Dev. 2017;28:1473–81.
4. Petz K, Alkemade R, Bakkenes M, Schulp CJE, van der Velde M, Leemans R. Mapping and modelling trade-offs and synergies between grazing intensity and ecosystem services in rangelands using global-scale datasets and models. Glob Environ Change. 2014;29:223–34.
5. Al-Shaar L, Satija A, Wang DD, Rimm EB, Smith-Warner SA, Stampfer MJ, Hu FB, Willett WC. Red meat intake and risk of coronary heart disease among US men: prospective cohort study. British Med J. 2020;371: m4141. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m4141.