Abstract
AbstractGhana is witnessing an increase in the construction of coastal flood defence walls on its coast but the effects of the coastal defence on people have not been well documented. This paper explores two issues: (1) indigenous strategies for preventing sea erosion and (2) the effects the modern coastal flood defence structures constructed along the southeastern coast of Ghana are having on the people. This study provides new insights into the understanding of indigenous methods that were used to address coastal flooding in the eastern section of Ghana and the effects the modern coastal defence structures are having on the people. Through multiphase sampling, a sample of 282 residents living in 17 communities affected by sea erosion in the Keta, Anloga, and Ada East District Assemblies where coastal defence structures were constructed were selected. Questionnaires were administered to these 282 respondents. Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) were also held in three communities, namely Keta, Atorkor and Totepe where coastal defence structures were constructed. The planning officers of the 3 district assemblies, the chief fishermen in the 3 communities where the FGDs were held, leaders of salt winners and 3 elders in each community were the key informants. Using descriptive statistics, the study revealed that, indigenous strategies like filling the beach with sand, building away from the seashore, and raising the foundations of buildings were used to protect the houses and communities from sea erosion but these strategies are no longer working thereby forcing the government to construct ‘modern’ coastal flood defence wallson the coast. The ‘modern’ coastal defence structures are in some places protecting the people and the land since they no longer experience sea erosion on a large scale. However, in places where armour rocks are used to protect the land, people now see them as preventing them from enjoying the natural beach as they used to and as a hindrance to their livelihoods of fishing. It is recommended that, as far as possible, soft engineering strategies like beach nourishment or sand dunes which are in line with the indigenous methods be used since they can lead to easy adaptation for sustainability.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference82 articles.
1. IPCC. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment. Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon, S., D. Q. In, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (eds.)] 2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
2. IPCC. Climate change Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Pörtner HO, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, Craig M, Langsdorf S, Löschke S, Möller V, Okem A, Rama B, editors. Contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2022.
3. Kelman I, Gaillard JC, Mercer J. Climate change’s role in disaster risk reduction’s future: beyond vulnerability and resilience. Int J Dis Risk Sci. 2015;6(1):21–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-015-0038-5.
4. Kumassah A. The most authentic migration saga of the Anlo-Ewes of Ghana. Keta: City Press; 2016.
5. Jayson-Quashigah P-N, Appeaning-Addo K, Kufogbe SK. Shoreline monitoring using medium resolution satellite imagery: A case study of the eastern coast of Ghana. In: Conley, D.C., Masselink, G., Russell, P.E. and O’Hare, T.J. (eds.), Proceedings 12th International Coastal Symposium (Plymouth, England). Journal of Coastal Research (Special Issue). 2013. 65:511-516. https://doi.org/10.2112/SI65-087.1.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献