Author:
Soulé Moussa,Nyamekye Clement,Abdoul-Azize Hamidou Taffa
Abstract
AbstractUrban schoolyards are essential in biodiversity conservation; they provide numerous ecosystem services to students, school managers, and the city where the schools are located. However, limited or no studies have explored the role of urban schoolyards in both biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. This study, therefore, assessed the structure and values of urban schoolyards forest in the cities of Niamey and Maradi in the Niger Republic. A total of 60 schools was selected purposively from Maradi and Niamey (30 schools in each city), where the data were collected through a face-to-face survey. Additionally, a forest inventory and participatory observations were conducted to gather the dendrometric data and animal biodiversity. The findings revealed that, a total of 97 different tree species belonging to 35 families and 81 genera. In addition, neem tree and Fabaceae (22 species) were found to be the dominant tree species and botanical family respectively in the schoolyards of both cities. The similarity index was 64% indicating high similarity between the floras of the schoolyards in the two cities. The biomass value equals about 48.91 t/ha and 27.49 t/ha carbon stock in the primary schools of Niamey and Maradi respectively. Furthermore, the analysis of the structure of the urban schoolyard forests showed high values of structural parameters indicating the vitality/health/integrity of the forest. The ability of students to name plants, animals, and ecosystem services of their schoolyards is significantly low. This study recommends the use of multipurpose woody plant species in urban greening school initiatives for quality education. Furthermore, the study recommends a further investigation of the effects of the school urban forest structure on the students' academic performance and the allergenic potential of woody species found in urban schools.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. McKinney ML. Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience. 2002;52:883–90. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0883:UBAC]2.0.CO;2.
2. Elmqvist T, Zipperer WC, Gii B. Urbanization, habitat loss and biodiversity decline Solution pathways to break the cycle. In: Seto KC, Solecki DW, Griffith CA, editors. The Routledge handbook of urbanization and global environmental change. London and New York: Rotledge Taylor & Francis Group; 2016. p. 139–52.
3. Borelli S, Conigliaro M. Urban forests in the global context. http://www.fao.org/3/i8707en/I8707EN.pdf. Unasylva 2018; 69: 3–79.
4. Nowak DJ, Hoehn RE, Bodine AR, Greenfield EJ, Neil-dunne JO. Urban forest structure, ecosystem services and change in Syracuse, NY. Urban Ecosyst. 2016;19:1455–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-013-0326-z.
5. Park H, Kramer M, Rhemtulla JM, Konijnendijk CC. Urban food systems that involve trees in Northern America and Europe: a scoping review. Urban For Urban Green. 2019;45: 126360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.06.003.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献