Author:
Enginler Sinem Özlem,Küçükdeniz Tarık,Dal Gamze Evkuran,Yıldırım Funda,Cilasun Gökçe Erdemir,Alkan Fulya Üstün,Gürgen Hazal Öztürk,Taşaltın Nevin,Sabuncu Ahmet,Yılmaz Merve,Karakuş Selcan
Abstract
AbstractThis study developed an innovative biosensor strategy for the sensitive and selective detection of canine mammary tumor biomarkers, cancer antigen 15–3 (CA 15–3) and mucin 1 (MUC-1), integrating green silver nanoparticles (GAgNPs) with machine learning (ML) algorithms to achieve high diagnostic accuracy and potential for noninvasive early detection. The GAgNPs-enhanced electrochemical biosensor demonstrated selective detection of CA 15–3 in serum and MUC-1 in tissue homogenates, with limits of detection (LODs) of 0.07 and 0.11 U mL−1, respectively. The nanoscale dimensions of the GAgNPs endowed them with electrochemically active surface areas, facilitating sensitive biomarker detection. Experimental studies targeted CA 15–3 and MUC-1 biomarkers in clinical samples, and the biosensor exhibited ease of use and good selectivity. Furthermore, ML algorithms were employed to analyze the electrochemical data and predict biomarker concentrations, enhancing the diagnostic accuracy. The Random Forest algorithm achieved 98% accuracy in tumor presence prediction, while an Artificial Neural Network attained 76% accuracy in CA 15–3-based tumor grade classification. The integration of ML techniques with the GAgNPs-based biosensor offers a promising approach for noninvasive, accurate, and early detection of canine mammary tumors, potentially revolutionizing veterinary diagnostics. This multilayered strategy, combining eco-friendly nanomaterials, electrochemical sensing, and ML algorithms, holds significant potential for advancing both biomedical research and clinical practice in the field of canine mammary tumor diagnostics.
Graphical Abstract
Funder
Istanbul Üniversitesi-Cerrahpasa
Istanbul University Cerrahpaşa
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Schneider R. Comparison of age, sex, and incidence rates in human and canine breast cancer. Cancer. 1970;26:419–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(197008)26:2.
2. Brodey RS, Fidler IJ, Howson AE. The relationship of estrous irregularity, pseudopregnancy, and pregnancy to the development of canine mammary neoplasms. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1966;149:1047–9.
3. Campos LC, Lavalle GE, Estrela-Lima A, Melgaço de Faria JC, Guimarães JE, Dutra ÁP, Ferreira E, de Sousa LP, Rabelo ÉML, Vieira da Costa AFD, Cassali GD. CA15.3, CEA and LDH in dogs with malignant mammary tumors. J Vet Intern Med. 2012;26:1383–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1939-1676.2012.01014.X.
4. Soares EDS, Valente FL, Rocha CC, Real Pereira CE, Sarandy TB, De Oliveira FLD, et al. Prognostic Factors for Cancer‐Specific Survival and Disease‐Free Interval of Dogs with Mammary Carcinomas. Vet Med Int. 2023;1-6890707. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6890707.
5. Goldschmidt MH, Peña L, Rasotto R, Zappulli V. Classification and grading of canine mammary tumors. Vet Pathol. 2011;48:117–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985810393258.