Abstract
AbstractUntargeted analysis of gas chromatography–high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS) data is a key and time-consuming challenge for identifying metabolite markers in food authentication applications. Few studies have been performed to evaluate the capability of untargeted data processing tools for feature extraction, metabolite annotation, and marker selection from untargeted GC-HRMS data since most of them are focused on liquid chromatography (LC) analysis. In this framework, this study provides a comprehensive evaluation of data analysis tools for GC-Orbitrap-HRMS plant metabolomics data, including the open-source MS-DIAL software and commercial Compound Discoverer™ software (designed for Orbitrap data processing), applied for the geographical discrimination and search for thyme markers (Spanish vs. Polish differentiation) as the case study. Both approaches showed that the feature detection process is highly affected by unknown metabolites (Levels 4–5 of identification confidence), background signals, and duplicate features that must be carefully assessed before further multivariate data analysis for reliable putative identification of markers. As a result, Compound Discoverer™ and MS-DIAL putatively annotated 52 and 115 compounds at Level 2, respectively. Further multivariate data analysis allowed the identification of differential compounds, showing that the putative identification of markers, especially in challenging untargeted analysis, heavily depends on the data processing parameters, including available databases used during compound annotation. Overall, this method comparison pointed out both approaches as good options for untargeted analysis of GC-Orbitrap-HRMS data, and it is presented as a useful guide for users to implement these data processing approaches in food authenticity applications depending on their availability.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference35 articles.
1. Núñez N, Vidal-Casanella O, Sentellas S, Saurina J, Núñez O. Characterization, classification and authentication of turmeric and curry samples by targeted LC-HRMS polyphenolic and curcuminoid profiling and chemometrics. Molecules. 2020;25:2942. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122942.
2. Simoes AJG, Hidalgo CA. The Economic Complexity Observatory: an analytical tool for understanding the dynamics of economic development. Work. Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell., 2011.
3. Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) - Spices HS4 0910: Global trade, exporters and importers. https://oec.world/en/profile/hs/spices. Accessed 31 Mar 2024.
4. Hoffman JM, Lafeuille J-L, Ragupathy S, Newmaster S. Spice and herb fraud. In: Hellberg RS, Sklare SA, Everstine K, editors. Food Fraud, Academic Press; 2021, pp. 177–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817242-1.00005-1.
5. Modupalli N, Naik M, Sunil CK, Natarajan V. Emerging non-destructive methods for quality and safety monitoring of spices. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2021;108:133–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.12.021.