Abstract
AbstractThe emergence of mass spectrometry (MS)-based methods to quantify proteins for clinical applications has led to the need for accurate and consistent measurements. To meet the clinical needs of MS-based protein results, it is important that the results are traceable to higher-order standards and methods and have defined uncertainty values. Therefore, we outline a comprehensive approach for the estimation of measurement uncertainty of a MS-based procedure for the quantification of a protein biomarker. Using a bottom-up approach, which is the model outlined in the “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurement” (GUM), we evaluated the uncertainty components of a MS-based measurement procedure for a protein biomarker in a complex matrix. The cause-and-effect diagram of the procedure is used to identify each uncertainty component, and statistical equations are derived to determine the overall combined uncertainty. Evaluation of the uncertainty components not only enables the calculation of the measurement uncertainty but can also be used to determine if the procedure needs improvement. To demonstrate the use of the bottom-up approach, the overall combined uncertainty is estimated for the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) candidate reference measurement procedure for albumin in human urine. The results of the uncertainty approach are applied to the determination of uncertainty for the certified value for albumin in candidate NIST Standard Reference Material® (SRM) 3666. This study provides a framework for measurement uncertainty estimation of a MS-based protein procedure by identifying the uncertainty components of the procedure to derive the overall combined uncertainty.
Graphical Abstract
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Biochemistry,Analytical Chemistry
Reference26 articles.
1. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML. International vocabulary of metrology - basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM). Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 200:2012. (3rd edition). URL: https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_\200_2012.pdf/f0e1ad45-d337-bbeb-53a6-15fe649d0ff1. Accessed 04 Feb 2023.
2. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML. Evaluation of measurement data - guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, JCGM 100:2008. URL: https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/2071204/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf/cb0ef43f-baa5-11cf-3f85-4dcd86f77bd6. Accessed 04 Feb 2023.
3. Magnusson B, Ossowicki H, Rienitz O, Theodorsson E. Routine internal- and external-quality control data in clinical laboratories for estimating measurement and diagnostic uncertainty using GUM principles. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2012; https://doi.org/10.3109/00365513.2011.649015.
4. Lee JH, Choi JH, Youn JS, Cha YJ, Song W, Park AJ. Comparison between bottom-up and top-down approaches in the estimation of measurement uncertainty. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2014-0801.
5. Beasley-Green A, Burris N, Bunk DM, Phinney KW. Multiplexed LC-MS/MS assay for urine albumin. J Proteome Res. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr500204c.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献