Author:
Cebrucean Dumitru,Cebrucean Viorica,Ionel Ioana,Spliethoff Hartmut
Funder
Technical University of Munich
Ministry of Labor, Family and Social Protection (Romania) and co-financed by the European Social Fund
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering,General Business, Management and Accounting,Economics and Econometrics
Reference49 articles.
1. Basavaraj RJ, Jayanti S (2015) Syngas-fueled, chemical-looping combustion-based power plant lay-out for clean energy generation. Clean Technol Envir 17(1):237–247. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0781-0
2. Basavaraja RJ, Jayanti S (2015) Comparative analysis of four gas-fired, carbon capture-enabled power plant layouts. Clean Technol Envir 17(8):2143–2156. doi: 10.1007/s10098-015-0936-7
3. CAESAR (2011) D 4.9 European best practice guidelines for assessment of CO2 capture technologies. Available from: http://caesar.ecn.nl/fileadmin/caesar/user/documents/D_4.9_best_practice_guide.pdf
4. Cebrucean D, Cebrucean V, Ionel I (2014) CO2 capture and storage from fossil fuel power plants. Energy Procedia 63:18–26. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.003
5. Cho P, Mattisson T, Lyngfelt A (2004) Comparison of iron-, nickel-, copper- and manganese-based oxygen carriers for chemical-looping combustion. Fuel 83(9):1215–1225. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2003.11.013
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献