Author:
Ghosh Nilanshu,Mothilal Bhagavathy Sivapriya,Thakur Jagruti
Abstract
AbstractWith the increasing electric vehicle (EV) penetration, there arises an immediate need for charging infrastructure. In the future, the electrification of transportation will reduce the requirement of existing fuel stations, thereby rendering them obsolete. However, they are best suited to cater to the charging demand of EVs as the drivers are accustomed to the locations and the incremental cost of providing this service will be lower. In this paper, we propose a novel methodology to assess the techno-economic feasibility of retrofitting an existing fuel station with EV charging infrastructure also known as Electric Vehicle Supply Equipment (EVSE). To further enhance the value proposition, the potential of integrating Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) with EV charging infrastructure, which results in the reduction of grid connection costs, is studied. The sustainability of the proposed system is improved with additional onsite Photovoltaic (PV) generation. The proposed methodology is implemented for the UK as a case study. The configurations in this study are designed based on the technical considerations involved in retrofitting a typical fuel station as a fast charging facility for EVs. From the results, it is observed that the configurations with 4 EVSE, 1 BESS, and 8 h of operation and the configuration with 4 EVSE, 1 BESS, and 1 PV system for 8 h of operation are economically viable. The abovementioned configurations are the most economically feasible configurations in terms of the Net Present Value (NPV), Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and the Discounted Payback Period (DPP) amongst the other configurations considered in this study. The proposed methodology indicates that though the connection cost is the dominant factor affecting the feasibility, the use of BESS with or without PV can reduce the connection cost by almost 90% depending on the capacity of BESS. The methodology acts as a decision support tool to select a techno-economically feasible configuration of EVSE, BESS, and PV.
Graphical abstract
Funder
Royal Institute of Technology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Environmental Chemistry,Environmental Engineering,General Business, Management and Accounting,Economics and Econometrics
Reference41 articles.
1. American Petroleum Institute. (2019) Energy-Understanding our oil supply chain. Energy API. https://www.api.org/~/media/Files/Policy/Safety/API-Oil-Supply-Chain.pdf
2. Aurora Energy Research Ltd. (2018) Opportunities in electric vehicle charging at commercial and industrial sites. https://www.auroraer.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Aurora-Report-Full-Opportunities-in-EV-charging-at-CI-sites-October-2018.pdf
3. Barnes J, Bhagavathy SM (2020) The economics of heat pumps and the (un)intended consequences of government policy. Energy Policy 138:111198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111198
4. Battery University. (2021) Elevating Self-discharge. Retrieved May 30, 2020, from https://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/elevating_self_discharge
5. BP Chargemaster. (2022) 150kW EV chargers. Retrieved July 9, 2020, from https://bpchargemaster.com/ultracharge-150/
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献