Abstract
AbstractIndustrial production of bio-based 2,3-butanediol via microbial conversion of sugars is intended to provide viable investment opportunities accompanied by reduced greenhouse gas emissions, compared to current fossil-based products. The potential impacts on the product minimum selling price and life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of further technology developments resulting in enhanced product yield, volumetric productivity and/or titres were assessed though a 33 full-factorial design. Aspen Plus® was employed to simulate multiple scenarios for 2,3-butanediol production from A-molasses in a biorefinery annexed to an existing sugarcane mill for subsequent techno-economic analysis. A 10% singular improvement in product yield, titre and volumetric productivity reduced the minimum selling price by 3.6%, 1.4% and 0.1%, whereas titre improvements reduced greenhouse gas emissions twice as much as product yield for a 10% step change. At the current state of technology, biobased 2,3-butanediol can achieve the minimum performance required to be a feasible alternative to fossil-based 2,3-butanediol with an estimated best minimum selling price of 1434$ t−12,3-BDO and greenhouse gas emissions 6.5 times less than those recorded for fossil-derived 1,4-butanediol. The minimum selling price and greenhouse gas emissions values can be reduced further by at least 16% and 14%, respectively, warranting further investment in strain and bioprocess performance enhancement. Overall, the research demonstrated that technological efforts intended to enhance the viability of biobased 2,3-butanediol production also minimized greenhouse gas emissions, integrating environmental and economic objectives for a sustainable bioeconomy.
Graphical abstract
Funder
National Research Foundation
Stellenbosch University
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference45 articles.
1. Abdel-Fatah MA, Hawash SI, Shaarawy HH (2021) Cost-effective clean electrochemical preparation of ferric chloride and its applications. Egypt J Chem 64(7):3841–3851. https://doi.org/10.21608/ejchem.2021.75921.3717
2. Alibaba (2022) 90% purity solid potassium hydroxide for making soap. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/90-Purity-Solid-Potassium-Hydroxide-For_1600574918358.html?spm=a2700.7724857.0.0.6bfe1ddaLHsHIh&s=p. Accessed 10 June 2023
3. Alibaba (2023) Factory price invertase enzyme powder food additives invertase enzyme. https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Factory-price-invertase-enzyme-powder-food_1600867006108.html?spm=a2700.7724857.0.0.225164f3VR4Xgq. Accessed 26 June 2023
4. Banerjee D, Eng T, Lau AK, Sasaki Y, Wang B, Chen Y, Prahl JP, Singan VR, Herbert RA, Liu Y, Tanjore D, Petzold CJ, Keasling JD, Mukhopadhyay A (2020) Genome-scale metabolic rewiring improves titers rates and yields of the non-native product indigoidine at scale. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19171-4
5. Bhagwat SS, Li Y, Cortés-Peña YR, Brace EC, Martin TA, Zhao H, Guest JS (2021) Sustainable production of acrylic acid via 3-hydroxypropionic acid from lignocellulosic biomass. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 9(49):16659–16669. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c05441